Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
| dc.creator | Cometta, Mosè | |
| dc.creator | Marcio Cid, Ignacio | |
| dc.date | 2023-01-12 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:34:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:34:30Z | |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/81134 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/tekn.81134 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181208 | |
| dc.description | This paper raises two questions: can the Web be a space for public debate? Can this debate be constructive? Adopting a non-normative and not overly narrow definition, it is possible to say that the Web is a space for public debate. However, some of its structural characteristics and some aspects of the dominant social media (individualism and the impossibility of establishing durable bonds of solidarity) can be interpreted as elements that contribute to social polarization on the Web. This makes it difficult to give a clear answer to the second question. | en-US |
| dc.description | Este artículo plantea dos cuestiones: ¿puede la Web ser un espacio de debate público? ¿Puede este debate ser constructivo? Adoptando una definición no normativa y no excesivamente limitada, es posible afirmar que la Web es un espacio de debate público. Sin embargo, algunas de sus características estructurales y algunos aspectos de las redes sociales dominantes (el individualismo y la imposibilidad de establecer vínculos de solidaridad duraderos) se interpretan como elementos que contribuyen a la polarización de los públicos en la Red. Esto hace difícil dar una respuesta clara a la segunda pregunta. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Grupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguas | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/81134/4564456562884 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Allcott, H. & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.31.2.211 Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition (2nd ed). University of Chicago Press. Bail, C. A. (2021). Breaking the social media prism: How to make our platforms less polarizing (1st ed.). Princeton University Press. Bernal, J. D. (1969). Science in history. M.I.T. Press. Bobbio, N. (2009). Quale democrazia? Morcellania. Campion, B. (2016). Dynamiques de construction et instrumentalisation de la légitimité dans les débats en ligne relatifs au réchauffement climatique. Questions de Communication, 30, 159–179. https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.10752 Chatzopoulou, S. & Exadaktylos, T. (2021). Whose Opinion Is It? Public Debates and Repertoires of Action in Greece During the First Covid-19 Lockdown Period. Javnost - The Public, 28(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1919381 Cometta, M. (2020). Protected Areas and Territorial Tensions: The Ticinese Case of Adula Park. Eco.Mont (Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research), 12(2), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1553/eco.mont-12-2s4 Cometta, M. (2021). Insufficiencies of a bottom-up approach at the time of fake news. Parco del Locarnese refusal example. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos, 122, 447–478. https://doi.org/10.9732/2021.v122.884 Crawford, M. (1999). Blurring the Boundaries: Public Space and Private Life. In J. Chase, M. Crawford & J. Kaliski (Eds.), Everyday urbanism: Featuring John Chase (pp. 22–35). Monacelli Press. Evans, N. (2010). Civic rites: Democracy and religion in ancient Athens. University of California Press. Ferraris, M. (2016). Mobilitazione totale. Laterza. Ferraris, M. & Torrengo, G. (2014). Documentality: A Theory of Social Reality. Rivista Di Estetica, 57, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.629 Flaxman, S., Goel, S. & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006 Forestal, J. (2022). Designing for Democracy: How to Build Community in Digital Environments (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197568750.001.0001 Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80. Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital prosumption labour on social media in the context of the capitalist regime of time. Time & Society, 23(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X13502117 Fuchs, C. & Sandoval, M. (2014). Digital Workers of the World Unite! A Framework for Critically Theorising and Analysing Digital Labour. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i2.549 Fuchs, C. & Unterberger, K. (Eds.). (2021). The Public Service Media and Public Service Internet Manifesto. University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book60 Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2009). Impoliteness and identity in the American news media: The “Culture Wars”. Journal of Politeness Research, 5, 273–303. Gramsci, A. (1971). Prison Notebooks. Lawrence & Wishart. Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT press. Han, B.-C. (2015). The transparency society. Stanford Briefs, an imprint of Stanford University Press. Han, B.-C. (2017). In the Swarm: Digital Prospects. MIT press. Hindman, M. S. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton University Press. Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford University Press. Kellner, D. (2021). Technology and Democracy: Toward A Critical Theory of Digital Technologies, Technopolitics, and Technocapitalism. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31790-4 Klintman, M. (2021). Knowledge resistance: How we avoid insight from others. Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526158703 Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J. & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359 (6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998 Lessig, L. (2006). Code (Version 2.0). Basic Books. Lyon, D. (2008). Biometrics, identification and surveillance. Bioethics, 22(9), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x McChesney, R. W. (2013). Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the Internet against democracy. The New Press. Moreno-Pestaña, J. L. (2019). Retorno a Atenas: La democracia como principio antioligárquico (Siglo XXI). http://www.digitaliapublishing.com/a/63479/ Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism (First edition). PublicAffairs. Mosco, V. (2017). Becoming digital: Toward a post-internet society (First edition). Emerald Publishing. Mouffe, C. (2005). The Return of the Political. Verso. Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics. Thinking the world politically. Verso. Nguyen, C. (2018). Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme, 17(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32 Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Polity. Patriquin, L. (2015). Economic equality and direct democracy in ancient athens. Palgrave Pivot. Plato. (1969). Republic. Harvard University Press. Pratschke, J. & Morlicchio, E. (2012). Social Polarisation, the Labour Market and Economic Restructuring in Europe: An Urban Perspective. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1891–1907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012444885 Purini, F. (2007). Spazio pubblico. In Enciclopedia Italiana. Treccani. https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/spazio-pubblico_%28Enciclopedia-Italiana%29/ Qvortrup, M. (2007). The politics of participation: From Athens to e-democracy. Manchester University Press. Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier (Rev. ed). MIT Press. Sachs, J. (2011). The price of civilization: Reawakening American virtue and prosperity (1st ed). Random House. Schmitt, C. (1985). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. MIT Press. Schmitt, C. (1996). Roman Catholicism and Political Form. Greenwod Press. Schmitt, R. (2020). But What If We Cannot Agree? Radical Philosophy Review, 23(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.5840/radphilrev2020219102 Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W. & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “Fake News”. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 Taylor, M. C. & Saarinen, E. (1994). Imagologies: Media philosophy. Routledge. Törnberg, P. (2018). Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion. PLoS ONE, 13(9), 1–21. Vernant, J. P. (1984). The origins of Greek thought. Cornell University Press. Vernant, J. P. (2000). Entre mythe et politique. Éd. du Seuil. Vidal-Naquet, P. (1986). The black hunter: Forms of thought and forms of society in the Greek world. Johns Hopkins University Press. Wilhelm, A. (2000). Democracy in the Digital Age. Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. Routledge. Wilkinson, R. G. & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. Bloomsbury Press. Young, J. R. (2006). The fight for classroom attention: Professor vs. Laptop. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(39), A27. Zuboff, S. (2018). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs. | |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2022 Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023): Democratic deliberation on the Net: From digital dialogue to digital noise; 101-107 | en-US |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 20 Núm. 1 (2023): Deliberación democrática en la Red: Del diálogo al ruido digital; 101-107 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 20 n. 1 (2023): Miscelánea; 101-107 | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 1549-2230 | |
| dc.subject | Digital capitalism | en-US |
| dc.subject | Social media | en-US |
| dc.subject | public sphere | en-US |
| dc.subject | polarization | en-US |
| dc.subject | capitalismo digital | es-ES |
| dc.subject | redes sociales | es-ES |
| dc.subject | esfera pública | es-ES |
| dc.subject | polarización | es-ES |
| dc.title | The new agora: The space of public debate in the digital age | en-US |
| dc.title | The new agora: The space of public debate in the digital age | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
|---|---|---|---|
|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |
|||