Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
| dc.creator | Gilbert, Michael | |
| dc.date | 2021-07-22 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-29T18:53:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-29T18:53:55Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/419 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.26807/rfj.v2i9.419 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/155411 | |
| dc.description | Sometimes rights conflict, as when the right to religion interferes with the right to equality. Often law does not prioritize rights, leaving judges to resolve conflicts among them based on their own intuitions and beliefs. This paper explores a new principle for resolving such cases: rule against the party that could have avoided the rights conflict more easily. This principle builds on “least cost avoidance,” a theory of liability developed by scholars in law and economics. The main objective of this paper is to adapt least cost avoidance to questions of rights. The secondary objective it to demonstrate the potential of economics in constitutional law. Economics has illuminated and influenced many legal fields. To influence constitutional law, economists must address the questions of lawyers and judges, meaning questions about constitutional doctrine. This paper presents a modest step in that direction. JEL CODE: F51, H11 | en-US |
| dc.description | ABSTRACTSometimes rights conflict, as when the right to religion interferes with the right to equality. Often law does not prioritize rights, leaving judges to resolve conflicts among them based on their own intuitions and beliefs. This paper explores a new principle for resolving such cases: rule against the party that could have avoided the rights conflict more easily. This principle builds on “least cost avoidance,” a theory of liability developed by scholars in law and economics. The main objective of this paper is to adapt least cost avoidance to questions of rights. The secondary objective it to demonstrate the potential of economics in constitutional law. Economics has illuminated and influenced many legal fields. To influence constitutional law, economists must address the questions of lawyers and judges, meaning questions about constitutional doctrine. This paper presents a modest step in that direction. KEYWORDS: justice, legal reform, legal norm, constitution,political system. RESUMENA veces, los derechos entran en conflicto, como cuando el derecho a la religión interfiere con el derecho a la igualdad. A menudo, la ley no prioriza los derechos, dejando que los jueces resuelvan los conflictos entre ellos basándose en sus propias intuiciones y creencias. Este artículo explora un nuevo principio para resolver estos casos: gobernar contra la parte que podría haber evitado el conflicto de derechos más fácilmente. Este principio se basa en "evitar el menor costo", una teoría de la responsabilidad desarrollada por académicos en derecho y economía. El principal objetivo de este documento es adaptar la evasión de menores costos a las cuestiones de derechos. El objetivo secundario es demostrar el potencial de la economía en el derecho constitucional. La economía ha iluminado e influido en muchos campos legales. Para influir en el derecho constitucional, los economistas deben abordar las cuestiones de abogados y jueces, es decir, cuestiones sobre la doctrina constitucional. Este artículo presenta un modesto paso en esa dirección. CÓDIGO JEL: F51, H11 | es-ES |
| dc.description | Parfois, les droits sont en conflit, comme lorsque le droit à la religion interfère avec le droit à l'égalité. Souvent, la loi ne donne pas la priorité aux droits, laissant les juges résoudre les conflits entre eux sur la base de leurs propres intuitions et croyances. Cet article explore un nouveau principe pour résoudre de tels cas : trancher contre la partie qui aurait pu éviter plus facilement le conflit de droits. Ce principe s'appuie sur « l'évitement au moindre coût », une théorie de la responsabilité développée par des universitaires en droit et en économie. L'objectif principal de cet article est d'adapter l'évitement à moindre coût aux questions de droits. L'objectif secondaire est de démontrer le potentiel de l'économie en droit constitutionnel. L'économie a éclairé et influencé de nombreux domaines juridiques. Pour influencer le droit constitutionnel, les économistes doivent répondre aux questions des avocats et des juges, c'est-à-dire des questions sur la doctrine constitutionnelle. Cet article présente un modeste pas dans cette direction. CODE JEL: F51, H11 | fr-FR |
| dc.description | A volte i diritti entrano in conflitto, come quando il diritto alla religione interferisce con il diritto all'uguaglianza. Spesso la legge non dà priorità ai diritti, lasciando ai giudici la risoluzione dei conflitti tra loro in base alle proprie intuizioni e convinzioni. Questo articolo esplora un nuovo principio per risolvere tali casi: regola contro la parte che avrebbe potuto evitare più facilmente il conflitto di diritti. Questo principio si basa sull'"elusione dei costi minimi", una teoria della responsabilità sviluppata da studiosi di diritto ed economia. L'obiettivo principale di questo documento è adattare l'elusione dei costi minimi alle questioni dei diritti. L'obiettivo secondario è dimostrare le potenzialità dell'economia nel diritto costituzionale. L'economia ha illuminato e influenzato molti campi legali. Per influenzare il diritto costituzionale, gli economisti devono affrontare le questioni di avvocati e giudici, cioè questioni di dottrina costituzionale. Questo documento presenta un modesto passo in quella direzione. CODICE GEL: F51, H11 | it-IT |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - PUCE: Centro de Publicaciones y Dirección de Investigación | es-ES |
| dc.relation | http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/419/204 | |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2021 Michael Gilbert | es-ES |
| dc.source | Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ´(Journal Faculty of Jurisprudence); No. 9: (Vol. II Special 75th Anniversary PUCE) Journal Faculty of Jurisprudence; 66 - 78 | en-US |
| dc.source | Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; Núm.9: (Vol. II Especial 75 Aniversario PUCE) Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; 66 - 78 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; No. 9 : (Vol. II Spécial 75e anniversaire PUCE) Revue Faculté de jurisprudence; 66 - 78 | fr-FR |
| dc.source | Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; No. 9: (Vol. II Speciale 75° Anniversario PUCE) Rivista Facoltà di Giurisprudenza; 66 - 78 | it-IT |
| dc.source | Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; No. 9: (Vol. II Especial 75º Aniversário PUCE) Revista Faculdade de Jurisprudência; 66 - 78 | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 2588-0837 | |
| dc.source | 10.26807/rfj.v2i9 | |
| dc.subject | Conflicts | es-ES |
| dc.subject | constitutional law | es-ES |
| dc.subject | legalsystem | es-ES |
| dc.subject | law&economics | es-ES |
| dc.title | Conflicts Among Rights: An Economic Approach | en-US |
| dc.title | Conflictos entre derechos: un enfoque económico | es-ES |
| dc.title | Conflits de droits : une approche économique | fr-FR |
| dc.title | Conflitti tra diritti: un approccio economico | it-IT |
| dc.title | Conflitos entre direitos: uma abordagem econômica | pt-BR |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
|---|---|---|---|
|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |
|||