Extradición de Rafael Correa vs asilo en Bélgica

Avalos Barreno, Iván Rodrigo

DSpace Principal
→
Colección de los Centros Asociados
→
Ecuador
→
Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - FCH-PUCE - Cosecha
→
Ver ítem

dc.creator	Avalos Barreno, Iván Rodrigo
dc.date	2020-06-18
dc.date.accessioned	2022-03-29T18:53:52Z
dc.date.available	2022-03-29T18:53:52Z
dc.identifier	http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/253
dc.identifier	10.26807/rfj.v7i7.253
dc.identifier.uri	http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/155368
dc.description	RESUMENEl trabajo analiza a la figura de la extradición y el asilo, a la luz del derecho internacional, conjuntamente con la posibilidad de que estas sean aplicadas en contra o a favor del expresidente del Ecuador Rafael Correa; utilizando para ello el método teórico de deducción al partir de los principios normativos de ambas figuras para aplicarlos teóricamente en el caso de Correa. La extradición es abordada en un primer apartado para luego continuar con los requisitos que el Ecuador debe tomar en cuenta para solicitarla, a continuación se intenta dar respuesta a la pregunta í‚¿Es requisito sine qua non la existencia de un convenio internacional entre el país requirente y el país requerido para aplicar la extradición?, el siguiente apartado trata sobre el principio de no intervención, posteriormente el asilo y la posibilidad de que Correa se beneficie del mismo así como los dictámenes de ACNUR son expuestos, para por ultimo realizar un cuadro comparativo entre la extradición y el asilo. El artículo concluye en que son más los fundamentos técnico- jurídicos en pos de que Correa obtenga el asilo en Bélgica, evadiendo así la extradición.     ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to determine if the regulatory measures implemented de facto by the Ecuadorian State for the commercialization of primary agricultural products, correctly, in products such as corn, raw milk and whey, and rice, comply with the objectives determined by the Organic Law for the Regulation and Control of Market Power and its Regulations. Furthermore, it can be determined as public aid. As analyzed, public aids can be conferred for reasons of social or public interest, or the benefit of consumers; and, in the Ecuadorian agricultural market in order to promote the production and transformation of food, aimed at guaranteeing food sovereignty and that are granted to small and mediumsized units of community production and of the famous and solidarity economy. It is concluded that the Superintendency of Control of Market Power is the public organism called to analyze the efficiency of the regulatory measures, taking into account that, since there is no clear competition policy, it cannot be determined whether these measures are indeed economically efficient; or on the contrary, the regulations harm the national economy.   KEYWORDS: Public aids, agricultural sector, ecuadorian primary products market, price-fixing.   JEL CODE / CLASIFICACIÓN JEL: H1, H83	es-ES
dc.description	This paper analyzes the figure of extradition and asylum, through international law, together with de possibility that they may be applied in favor or against the former president of Ecuador Rafael Correa; using for this the theoretical deduction method based on the normative principles of both figures to apply then theoretically in the case of Correa. The extradition is analyzed in the first chapter and then continues with the requirements that Ecuador needs to request it, next the question í‚¿ the existence of an international agreement between the requesting country and the required country to apply the extradition is a sine qua non requirement? Is try to answer, the next chapter deals with the principle of non-intervention, subsequently the asylum and the possibility that Correa would benefit for it and the ACNUR's opinions are exposed, for finally make a comparative table between extradition and asylum. The article concludes that there are more technical-legal foundations for Correa to obtain asylum in Belgium, thus avoiding the extradition.                JEL CODE: H1, H83	en-US
dc.format	application/pdf
dc.language	spa
dc.publisher	Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - PUCE: Centro de Publicaciones y Dirección de Investigación	es-ES
dc.relation	http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/253/156
dc.rights	Derechos de autor 2020 Revista de la Facultad de Jurisprudencia RFJ	es-ES
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ´(Journal Faculty of Jurisprudence); No. 7: Journal of the Faculty of Jurisprudence; 158-178	en-US
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; Núm. 7: Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; 158-178	es-ES
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; N ° 7: Journal de la Faculté de Jurisprudence; 158-178	fr-FR
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; N. 7: Giornale della Facoltà di Giurisprudenza; 158-178	it-IT
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; Nº 7: Jornal da Faculdade de Jurisprudência; 158-178	pt-BR
dc.source	2588-0837
dc.source	10.26807/rfj.v7i7
dc.subject	sovereignty	en-US
dc.subject	asylum	en-US
dc.subject	State	en-US
dc.subject	an international treaty	en-US
dc.subject	soberanía	es-ES
dc.subject	refugio	es-ES
dc.subject	Estado	es-ES
dc.subject	extradición	es-ES
dc.subject	asilo	es-ES
dc.title	Extradición de Rafael Correa vs asilo en Bélgica	es-ES
dc.title	Extradition of Rafael Correa vs asylum in Belgium	en-US
dc.title	Extradition contre asile de Rafael Correa en Belgique	fr-FR
dc.title	Estradizione di Rafael Correa vs asilo in Belgio	it-IT
dc.title	Extradição de Rafael Correa vs asilo na Bélgica	pt-BR
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion