RESUMENEl objetivo de este artículo es describir la importancia de la argumentación legal para los sistemas normativos de la tradición jurídica romana. Bajo ese propósito, este documento se dividió en tres secciones. En primer lugar, explora el razonamiento legal aplicado por la comunidad legal (considerando a la lógica como un elemento clave de análisis). En segundo lugar, el impacto de la praxeología como ciencia de la acción humana. Finalmente, se discute la importancia de la argumentación legal como una herramienta para jueces y juristas.
ABSTRACTThe aim of this paper is to describe the standing position of legal argumentation for normative systems of Roman legal tradition. This paper was divided into the following three sections: Firstly, it explores the legal reasoning applied by the legal community (considering logic as a key element of analysis). Secondly, the impact of praxeology as a science of human action. Finally, it discusses the significance of legal argumentation as a tool available to judges and jurists.
KEY WORDS: legal logic, legal argumentation, legal reasoning, praxeology, legal theory.
JEL CODE /CLASIFICACIÓN JEL: K11, K39
The aim of this paper is to describe the standing position of legal argumentation for normative systems of Roman legal tradition. This paper was divided into the following three sections: Firstly, it explores the legal reasoning applied by the legal community (considering logic as a key element of analysis). Secondly, the impact of praxeology as a science of human action. Finally, it discusses the significance of legal argumentation as a tool available to judges and jurists.
KEY WORDS: legal logic, legal argumentation, legal reasoning, praxeology, legal theory.
JEL CODE: K11, K39