Dialogue between courts in relation to vulnerable groups

Hernández Muñoz, Verónica De Lourdes

DSpace Principal
→
Colección de los Centros Asociados
→
Ecuador
→
Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - FCH-PUCE - Cosecha
→
Ver ítem

dc.creator	Hernández Muñoz, Verónica De Lourdes
dc.date	2018-12-27
dc.date.accessioned	2022-03-29T18:53:29Z
dc.date.available	2022-03-29T18:53:29Z
dc.identifier	http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/101
dc.identifier	10.26807/rfj.v0i4.101
dc.identifier.uri	http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/155317
dc.description	In this article we will try to determine the existence of a dialogue between courts of the deliberative type, whose objective is the coordination of actions to achieve a better course of action achieving an effective action and with less negative effects and the relationship of this with the protection of vulnerable groups foreseen in the Ecuadorian constitution, for this analysis is taken as reference the ex-traordinary protection actions resolved by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador in the period 2008-2018, specifically five processes have been considered in which reference and appointment of the criteria of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights issued in rulings or advisory opinions where it was resolved in favor of a gender case or for the benefit of persons belonging to priority attention groups. This will identify, in each case, the precedent or jurisprudential rule that the Ecuadorian constitutional judges dictated in this context and that will constitute jurisprudential precedents for its application in the future. KEYWORDS: constitutional law, access to justice, right to work, judicial decision, right of vulnerable groups JEL CODE: J13, J15	en-US
dc.description	RESUMENEn el presente artículo se buscará determinar la existencia de un diálogo entre cortes del tipo deliberativo, cuyo objetivo es la coordinación de actuaciones para conseguir un mejor curso de acción logrando una actuación eficaz y con menores efectos negativos y la relación de este con la protección de grupos vulnerables previstos en la Constitución ecuatoriana, para este análisis se toma como referencia las acciones extraordinarias de protección resueltas por la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador en el período 2008-2018, específicamente se han considerado cinco procesos en los que se hace referencia y cita de los criterios de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos emitidos en fallos u opiniones consultivas donde se resolvió a favor de un caso de género o en beneficio de personas pertenecientes a grupos de atención prioritaria. Se identificará, de esta manera en cada caso el precedente o regla jurisprudencial que los jueces constitucionales ecuatorianos dictaron bajo este contexto y que constituirán precedentes jurisprudenciales para su aplicación en el futuro. ABSTRACTIn this article we will try to determine the existence of a dialogue between courts of the deliberative type, whose objective is the coordination of actions to achieve a better course of action achieving an effective action and with less negative effects and the relationship of this with the protection of vulnerable groups foreseen in the Ecuadorian constitution, for this analysis is taken as reference the extraordinary protection actions resolved by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador in the period 2008-2018, specifically five processes have been considered in which reference and appointment of the criteria of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights issued in rulings or advisory opinions where it was resolved in favor of a gender case or for the benefit of persons belonging to priority attention groups. This will identify, in each case, the precedent or jurisprudential rule that the Ecuadorian constitutional judges dictated in this context and that will constitute jurisprudential precedents for its application in the future. KEYWORDS: constitutional law, access to justice, right to work, judicial decision, right of vulnerable groups JEL CODE / CLASIFICACIÓN JEL: J13, J15	es-ES
dc.format	application/pdf
dc.format	text/html
dc.language	spa
dc.publisher	Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - PUCE: Centro de Publicaciones y Dirección de Investigación	es-ES
dc.relation	http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/101/81
dc.relation	http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/101/99
dc.rights	Derechos de autor 2018 Revista de la Facultad de Jurisprudencia RFJ	es-ES
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ´(Journal Faculty of Jurisprudence); No. 4: Journal Faculty of Jurisprudence; 22	en-US
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; Núm. 4: Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; 22	es-ES
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; No. 4: Revue Faculté de jurisprudence; 22	fr-FR
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; No. 4: Rivista Facoltà di Giurisprudenza; 22	it-IT
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; No. 4: Revista Faculdade de Jurisprudência; 22	pt-BR
dc.source	2588-0837
dc.source	10.26807/rfj.v0i4
dc.subject	constitutional law	en-US
dc.subject	access to justice	en-US
dc.subject	right to work	en-US
dc.subject	judicial decision	en-US
dc.subject	right of vulnerable groups	en-US
dc.subject	derecho constitucional	es-ES
dc.subject	acceso a la justicia	es-ES
dc.subject	derecho al trabajo	es-ES
dc.subject	sentencia judicial	es-ES
dc.subject	derecho de grupos vulnerables	es-ES
dc.title	Dialogue between courts in relation to vulnerable groups	en-US
dc.title	Diálogo entre cortes en relación con los grupos vulnerables	es-ES
dc.title	Dialogue entre les tribunaux concernant les groupes vulnérables	fr-FR
dc.title	Dialogo tra tribunali in relazione ai gruppi vulnerabili	it-IT
dc.title	Diálogo entre tribunais em relação a grupos vulneráveis	pt-BR
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion