Bemerkungen zum Imperfekt im Navaho

dc.creator	Pinnow, Hans-Jürgen
dc.date	1974-01-01
dc.date.accessioned	2022-03-29T18:06:13Z
dc.date.available	2022-03-29T18:06:13Z
dc.identifier	http://journals.iai.spk-berlin.de/index.php/indiana/article/view/1590
dc.identifier	10.18441/ind.v2i0.33-46
dc.identifier.uri	http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/150786
dc.description	Linguists disagree on the number of imperfective paradigms used in Navaho. Young and Morgan think that there are five or even six different types; according to Sapir and Hoijer thero are three whereas Krauss and Stanley reduce the number to two. An examination of the problem shows that one must differentiate between at least four paradigms. The second person singular is recommended as a starting-point for the classification as in this case most variants of form exist.	en-US
dc.format	application/pdf
dc.language	deu
dc.publisher	Ibero-Amerikanisches Institut - Preußischer Kulturbesitz	es-ES
dc.relation	http://journals.iai.spk-berlin.de/index.php/indiana/article/view/1590/1228
dc.rights	Derechos de autor 1974 INDIANA	es-ES
dc.rights	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0	es-ES
dc.source	INDIANA; Vol. 2 (1974); 33-46	en-US
dc.source	INDIANA; Vol. 2 (1974); 33-46	es-ES
dc.source	INDIANA; Bd. 2 (1974); 33-46	de-DE
dc.source	INDIANA; v. 2 (1974); 33-46	pt-BR
dc.source	2365-2225
dc.source	0341-8642
dc.source	10.18441/ind.v2i0
dc.title	Bemerkungen zum Imperfekt im Navaho	de-DE
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion