Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
| dc.creator | Mendes dos Santos, Gilton | |
| dc.creator | Henriques Soares, Guilherme | |
| dc.date | 2021-02-09 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-25T14:06:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-25T14:06:37Z | |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/imanimundo/article/view/89601 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.15446/ma.v12n1.89601 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/123351 | |
| dc.description | Abstract Lately, the concept of domestication, like depicted in the Great Narrative with its basis in the history of Near East, is passing through strong criticism. In the context of the discussion about Anthropic Amazon, the concept has gained different shades and has been amplified and dissociated from the notion of agriculture and sedentarism. This work has a double objective: near or intertwine the narrative lines between the bias of the debate about the domestication of Amazonian forests; and show there are other practices or kinds of relations between humans and plants that are out of range to the idea of domestication. | en-US |
| dc.description | Últimamente ha habido una fuerte crítica sobre el concepto de domesticación forjado por la Gran Narrativa basada en la historia del Cercano Oriente, que lo asocia con la dominación de la naturaleza por el hombre, el sedentarismo, la creación de excedentes, el progreso y el origen del Estado. A su vez, en el contexto de la Amazonía antrópica, el concepto adquirió matices particulares, habiéndose expandido y disociado de la noción de agricultura y estilo de vida sedentario. Este trabajo tiene un doble objetivo: traer o entrelazar las líneas narrativas de estas dos corrientes de debate y tratar de mostrar otras prácticas o tipos de relación entre humanos y plantas que están fuera del alcance de la domesticación. | es-ES |
| dc.description | Ultimamente tem sido contundente a crítica sobre o conceito de domesticação tal qual forjado pela Grande Narrativa com base na história do Oriente Próximo, que o associa ao domínio da Natureza pelo homem, ao sedentarismo, à criação de excedente, ao progresso e à origem do Estado. Por sua vez, no contexto da Amazônia antrópica, o conceito ganhou matizes particulares, tendo sido ampliado e dissociado da noção de agricultura e sedentarismo. Este trabalho tem um duplo objetivo: aproximar ou fazer cruzar as linhas narrativas destes dois fluxos do debate e tentar mostrar outras práticas ou tipos da relação entre humanos e plantas que estão fora do alcance da domesticação. | pt-BR |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | por | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Amazonia - Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones (IMANI) - Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia Social (PPGAS) | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/imanimundo/article/view/89601/78223 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/ALBERT, Bruce. (1985). Temps dus sangs, temps des cendres. Représentation de la meladie, systèmerituel et espace politique chez les Yanomami du sud-est (Amazonie brésilienne) (These présentée em vue du grade de docteur). Université de Paris X, laboratoire d’ethnologie et de sociologie comparative, Paris. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/AZEVEDO, Dagoberto Lima. (2018). Agenciamento do mundo pelos Kumuã Ye’pamahsã. O conjunto dos bahsese na organização do espaço Di’ta Nʉhkʉ. Coleção Reflexividades Indígenas. Núcleo de Estudos da Amazônia Indígena - NEAI. Manaus: Edua. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/BALÉE, W. (1989). The Culture of Amazonian Forests. In Darrell. A. Posey and William Balée (Eds.), Resource Management in Amazonia: Indigenous and Folk Strategies (pp.1–21). New York: NYGB Press. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/BALÉE, W. (1994). Footprints of the forest: Ka’apor ethnobotany – a historical ecology of plant utilization by an Amazonian people. New York: Columbia University Press. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/BALÉE, W. (1998). Historical ecology: premises and postulates. In William Balée (Ed.), Advances in Historical Ecology (pp.13-29). New York: Columbia University Press. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/BALÉE, W. and Erickson, C. L. (2006). Time, Complexity and Historical Ecology. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/bale13562 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/BRUZZI, A. (1962). A civilização do Uaupés. Missão Salesiana do Rio Negro – Amazonas – Brasil, São Paulo. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/BUSH, M. B. and Silman, M. R. (2007). Amazonian exploitation revisited: ecological asymmetry and the policy pendulum. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 457-465. https://doi.org/10.1890/070018 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/CARNEIRO DA CUNHA, M. (2019). Antidomestication in the Amazon. Swidden and its foes. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 9(1), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1086/703870 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/CASSIDY, R. and Mullin, M. (2007). Where the Wild Things are Now. Domestication reconsidered. New York: Berg, Oxford. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/CHERNELA, J. M. (1987). Pesca e hierarquização tribal no alto Uaupés. Suma etnológica brasileira, 1, 235-249. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/CLEMENT, C. R. (1999a). 1492 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources. I. The relation between domestication and human population decline. Economic Botany 53, 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866498 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/CLEMENT, C. R. (1999b). 1492 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources. II. Crop biogeography at contact. Economic Botany 53, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866499 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/CLEMENT, C. R. (2014). “Landscape domestication and archaeology,” in Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, edited by Claire Smith, 4388-4394. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_817 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/CLEMENT, C. R., de Cristo-araújo, M., D’eeckenbrugge, G. C., Pereira, A. A. and Rodrigues, D. P. (2010). Origin and domestication of native Amazonian crops. Diversity 2, 72-106. https://doi.org/10.3390/d2010072 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/CLEMENT, C. R., Denevan, W. M., Heckenberger, M. J., Junqueira, A. B., Neves, E. G., Teixeira, W. G. and Woods, W. I. (2015). The domestication of Amazonia before European conquest. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1812), 20150813.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0813 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/DESCOLA, P. (2016). Landscape as transfiguration. Edward Westermarck memorial Lecture, October. Suomen Antropologi, 41(1), 3-13. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/EMPERAIRE, L., Eloy, L. (2008). A cidade, um foco de diversidade agrícola no Rio Negro (Amazonas, Brasil)?. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, 3(2), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1981-81222008000200005 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/FAUSTO, C. (2012). Too many owners: ownership and mastery in Amazonia. In Marc Brightman, Vanessa Grotti and Olga Ulturgasheva (Eds), Shamanism in rainforest and tundra (pp.85–105). Oxford: Berghahn. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/FAUSTO, C. and Neves, E. G. (2018). Was there ever a Neolithic in the Neotropics? Plant familiarization and biodiversity in the Amazon. Antiquity, 92(366), 1604-1618. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.157 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/FIJN, N. (2018). Dog ears and tails. Different Relational Ways of Being with Canines in Aboriginal Australia and Mongolia. In Heather Anne Swanson, Marianne Elisabeth Lien and Gro B. Ween (Eds), Domestication Gone Wild. Politics and Practices of Multispecies Relations (pp.72-93). Durham and London: Duke University Press. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/HARAWAY, D. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People and Significant Otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press: Chicago. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/HECKEBERGER, M. J. and Neves, E. G. (2009). Amazonian Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38, 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164310 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/HECKENBERGER, M. J., Kuikuro, A., Kuikuro, U. T., Russell, J. C., Schmidt, M., Fausto, C. and Franchetto, B. (2003). Amazonia 1492: pristine forest or cultural parkland? Science, 301, 1710-1714. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1086112 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/HECKENBERGER, M. J., Russell, J. C., Toney, J. R. and Schmidt, M. J. (2007). The legacy of cultural landscapes in the Brazilian Amazon: Implications for biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1979 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/KIRKSEY, E. and Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/KROEMER, G. (1994). Kunahã Made, o povo do veneno, sociedade e cultura do povo Zuruahá. Edições Mensageiro: Belém. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/LEVIS, C., Costa, F. R. C., Bongers, F., Peña-Claros, M., Clement, C. R.,. Junqueira, A. B., Neves, E. G., … ter Steege, H. (2017). Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition. Science 355 (6328), 925-931. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal0157 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/LEVIS, C., Flores, B. M., Moreira, P. A., Luize, B. G., Alves, R. P., Franco-Moraes, J., Lins, J., ..., Clement, C. R. (2018). How people domesticated Amazonian forests. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00171 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/LEVIS, Carolina. (2018). Domestication of Amazonian Forests (Tese de doutorado). Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Brazil e Wageningen University, Netherlands. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/LIEN, M. E. (2018). Ducks into houses. Domestication and its margins. In Heather Anne Swanson, Marianne Elisabeth Lien and Gro B. Ween (Eds), Domestication Gone Wild. Politics and Practices of Multispecies Relations (pp.117-137). Durham and London: Duke University Press. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/MCMICHAEL, C. H., Bush, M. B., Piperno, D. R., Silman, M. R., Zimmerman, A. R. and Anderson, C. (2012). Spatial and temporal scales of pre-Columbian disturbance associated with western Amazonian lakes. The Holocene, 22, 131-141. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/MEGGERS, B. J. (Ed.). (1971). Evolution and anthropology: A centennial appraisal. anthropological society of Washington. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/MENDES DOS SANTOS, G. (2016). Plantas e parentelas. Notas sobre a história da agricultura no Médio Purus. In Gilton Mendes dos Santos and Miguel Aparicio (Eds), Redes Arawa. Ensaios de etnologia do Médio Purus (pp.19-39). Manaus: EDUA. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/MURPHY, R. F. (1960). Headhunter's Heritage. Social and economic change among the munduruku indians. California: Berkeley and Los Angeles. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/NEVES, E. G. (2007). El Formativo que Nunca Terminó: la larga historia de estabilidad em lãs ocupaciones humanas de La Amazonía Central. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 11, 117-142. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/NEVES, E. G., Petersen, J. B., Bartone, R. N. and Silva, C. A. (2003). Historical and socio-cultural origins of Amazonian Dark Earths. In Johannes Lehmann, Dirse C. Kern, Brundi Glaser and William I. Woods (Eds), Amazonian Dark Earths: origin, properties, management (pp.29–50). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2597-1_3 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/OLIVEIRA, J. C. (2016). Mundos de roças e florestas. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciencias Humanas. Belém, 11(1), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981.81222016000100007 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/PERES, C. A., and Baider, C. (1997). Seed dispersal, spatial distribution and population structure of Brazilnut trees (Bertholletia excelsa) in southeastern Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 595-616. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400010749 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/PIPERNO, D. R. (2011). The origins of plant cultivation and domestication in the New World tropics: patterns, process, and new developments. Current. Anthropology, 52, 453-470. https://doi.org/10.1086/659998 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/PIPERNO, D. R., McMichael, C., and Bush, M. B. (2015). Amazonia and the Anthropocene: What was the spatial extent and intensity of human landscape modifcation in the Amazon Basin at the end of prehistory? The Holocene, 25, 1588–1597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683615588374 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/POSEY, D. A. (1997). Manejo da floresta secundária, capoeiras, campos e cerrados. In: Berta G. Ribeiro (Ed.), Suma etnológica brasileira. Vol. 1. Etnobiologia (pp. 199-215). Belém: Ed. Universidade Federal do Pará. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/ROOSEVELT, A. (1989). Resource management in Amazonia before the conquest: beyond ethnographic projection. Advances in Economic Botany, 7, 30-62. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/SCOTT, J. C. (2017). Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bvnfk9 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/SHEPARD Jr., G. and Ramirez, H. (2011). Made in Brazil: Human dispersal of the Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa, Lecythidaceae) in ancient Amazonia. Economic Botany 1235, 65(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-011-9151-6 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/SHEPARD, G., Clement, C. R., Mendes dos Santos, G., Pinto, H., Moraes, C. ans Neves, E G. (2019). Ancient and Traditional Agriculture In South America:Tropical Lowlands. Oxford Encyclopedia of Agriculture and the Environment, edited by Richard Hazlitt. Oxford University Press: Oxford. Manuscript in press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.597 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/SHEPARD, G., Neves, E. G., Clement, C. R., Pinto, H., Moraes, C. and Mendes dos Santos, G. (2020). Ancient and Traditional Agriculture In South America: Tropical Lowlands. Oxford Encyclopedia of Agriculture and the Environment, edited by Richard Hazlitt. Oxford University Press: Subject: Agriculture and the Environment On line Publication Date: Feb 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.597 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/SHOCK, M. and Moraes, C. (2019). A floresta é o domus: a importância das evidências arqueobotânicas e arqueológicas das ocupações humanas amazônicas na transição Pleistoceno/Holoceno. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, 14(2), 263-289. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981.81222019000200003 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/SPRUCE, R. (1853). Journal of a Voyage up the Amazon and Rio Negro. HOOKER, WJ, 210-212. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/STEWARD, F. C. (1963). Plant physiology. Vol. 3. Inorganic nutrition of plants. Plant physiology. Vol. 3. Inorganic nutrition of plants. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/STEWARD, Julian (ed.). (1946-1950). Handbook of South American Indians. V. 1-6. Washington: Smithsonian Institution. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/SWANSON, H. A., Marianne Elisabeth Lien and Gro B. Ween (orgs.). (2018). Domestication Gone Wild. Politics and Practices of Multispecies Relations. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822371649 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/TSING, A. (2012). Unruly Edges: Mushrooms as Companion Species. Environmental Humanities, 1, 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3610012 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/TSING, A. (2015). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77bcc | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/TSING, A. L. (2018). Nine provocations for the study of domestication. In Heather Anne Swanson, Marianne Elisabeth Lien and Gro B. Ween (Eds), Domestication Gone Wild. Politics and Practices of Multispecies Relations (pp.231-251). Durham and London: Duke University Press. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/VAN DOOREN, T. (2012). Wild Seed, Domesticated Seed: Companion species and the emergence of agriculture. PAN: Philosophy, Activism, Nature, 9(9), 22-28. https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=533917400637473;res=IELHSS | |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2021 Gilton Mendes dos Santos, Guilherme Henriques Soares | es-ES |
| dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Mundo Amazónico; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2021): enero-junio; 281-300 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Mundo Amazónico; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): January-June; 281-300 | en-US |
| dc.source | Mundo Amazónico; v. 12 n. 1 (2021): Janeiro-junho; 281-300 | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 2145-5082 | |
| dc.source | 2145-5074 | |
| dc.subject | Domesticação | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | plantas silvestres | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | Amazônia | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | povos indígenas | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | Domesticación | es-ES |
| dc.subject | plantas salvajes | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Amazonia | es-ES |
| dc.subject | pueblos indígenas | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Domestication | en-US |
| dc.subject | wild plants | en-US |
| dc.subject | Amazonia | en-US |
| dc.subject | indigenous people | en-US |
| dc.title | Unruly Amazon: relations out of range to the ideia of domestication | en-US |
| dc.title | Amazonia indomable: relaciones fuera del alcance de la domesticación | es-ES |
| dc.title | Amazônia indomável: relações fora do alcance da domesticação | pt-BR |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type | Artículo revisado por pares | es-ES |
| dc.type | Peer-reviewed Article | en-US |
| Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
|---|---|---|---|
|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |
|||