Repositorio Dspace

Current Trends in Public Policy Evaluation

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creator Rodríguez Cano, Norman Simón
dc.date 2018-07-01
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-23T15:10:28Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-23T15:10:28Z
dc.identifier https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ede/article/view/75382
dc.identifier 10.15446/ede.v28n53.75382
dc.identifier.uri http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/109725
dc.description Policy evaluation is a discipline dedicated to the qualitative and quantitative examination of the decisions made by governments to provide solutions for pressing social issues. Its methods and concepts come from a variety of fields, such as economics, political science, statistics and computer science, among others. This paper provides the historical and methodological background of the current trends in policy evaluation, focusing on formative evaluation and impact evaluation. It also reflects on the potential applications of artificial intelligence and big data in this discipline en-US
dc.description La evaluación de políticas públicas es una disciplina que tiene como objeto el examen cualitativo y cuantitativo de las decisiones tomadas por los gobiernos para resolver problemáticas sociales. Metodológica y conceptualmente, se nutre de la economía, la ciencia política, la estadística y la computación, entre otras ciencias. En este artículo se contextualizan histórica y metodológicamentelas tendencias actuales en la evaluación de políticas públicas, especialmente en la evaluación de diseño y la evaluación de impacto. También se reflexiona acerca de las potencialidades de la inteligencia artificial y el big data para esta disciplina. es-ES
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/xml
dc.language spa
dc.publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín - Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y Económicas - Departamento de Economía es-ES
dc.relation https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ede/article/view/75382/69781
dc.relation https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ede/article/view/75382/70088
dc.relation /*ref*/Basu, K. (2013). The Method of Randomization and the Role of Reasoned Intuition.The World Bank Group. Recuperado de https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2367082
dc.relation /*ref*/Bates, M. y Glennerster, R. (2017). The Generalizability Puzzle. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 15(3). https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_generalizability_puzzle
dc.relation /*ref*/Berry, D. (2006). Bayesian Clinical Trials. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, 5, 27-36. https://www.stat.ubc.ca/~rollin/teach/bar/Berry2006NatureReviewsDD.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Blumenstock, J., Cadamuro, G. y On, R. (2015). Predicting Poverty and Wealth from Mobile Phone Metadata. Science, 350(6264), 1073-1076. http://sampleu.ec.unipi.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Science-2015-Blumenstock-1073-6.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Brodersen, K. (23 de septiembre de 2015). Causal Attribution in an Era of Big Time-Series Data. [Mensaje en un blog]. Recuperado de http://www.unofficialgoogledatascience.com/2015/09/causal-attribution-in-era-of-big-time.html
dc.relation /*ref*/Brodersen, K., Galluser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N. y Scott, S. (2015). Inferring Causal Impact Using Bayesian Structural Time-Series Models. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.00356.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Brodersen, K. y Hauser, A. (2017). An R Package for Causal Inference Using Bayesian Structural Time-Series Models. CRAN. Recuperado de https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/CausalImpact/vignettes/CausalImpact.html
dc.relation /*ref*/Cartwright, N. (2014). Evidence: For Policy And Wheresoever Rigor is a Must. Londres: The London School of Economics and Political Science.
dc.relation /*ref*/Cartwright, N. y Munro, E. (2010). The Limitations of Randomized Controlled Trials in Predicting Effectiveness. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16(2), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01382.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Cencini, A. (2005). Macroeconomic Foundations of Macroeconomics. Nueva York: Routledge.
dc.relation /*ref*/Donaldson, D. y Storeygard, A. (2016). The View From Above: Applications of Satellite Data in Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(4), 171-198. http://dave-donaldson.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/10/Donaldson_Storeygard_JEP.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Duflo, E. y Banerjee, A. (2012). Repensar la pobreza: un giro radical en la lucha contra la desigualdad global. Madrid: Taurus.
dc.relation /*ref*/Duflo, E. y Banerjee, A. (eds.). (2017). Handbook of Field Experiments, Volume 1. Amsterdan: Elsevier.
dc.relation /*ref*/Fienberg, S. (2011). Subjective Bayesian Models and Methods in Public Policy and Government Settings. Statistical Science, 26(2), 212-226. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-STS331
dc.relation /*ref*/Fisher, R. (1937). The Design of Experiments. Edimburgo: Oliver and Boyd.
dc.relation /*ref*/Forrester, J. (1969). Urban Dynamics. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Forrester, J. (1971). World Dynamics. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and The last Man. Nueva York : The Free Press. Ghaffarzadegan, N., Lyneis, J. y Richardson, G. (2011). How Small System Dynamics Models Can Help the Public Policy Process. System Dynamics Review, 27(1), 22-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.442
dc.relation /*ref*/Giabbanelli, P. y Crutzen, R. (2017). Using Agent-Based Models to Develop Public Policy about Food Behaviours: Future Directions and Recommendations. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2017, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5742629
dc.relation /*ref*/Ge, F., Wei, Z., Lu, Y., Tian, Y. y Li, L. (2012). Decentralized Coordination Of Autonomous Swarms Inspired by Chaotic Behavior of Ants. Nonlinear Dynamics, 70(1), 571-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-012-0478-z
dc.relation /*ref*/Gentile, J., Glazner, C. y Koehler, M. (2015). Simulation Models for Public Policy. En B. Furtado, P. Sakowski y M. Tóvolli (Eds.), Modeling Complex Systems For Public Policies (pp.73-83). Brasilia: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada – IPEA.
dc.relation /*ref*/Gertler, P., Martínez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. y Vermeersch, C. (2017). La evaluación de impacto en la práctica: segunda edición. Washington: Banco Mundial – Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
dc.relation /*ref*/Glaeser, E., Duke, S., Luca, M. y Naik, N. (2015). Big Data and Big Cities: The Promises and Limitations of Improved Measures of Urban Life. National Bureau of Economic Research. Recuperado de http://www.nber.org/papers/w21778
dc.relation /*ref*/Glennerster, R. (2017). When Do Innovation and Evidence Change Lives? [Mensaje en un blog]. Recuperado de http://runningres.com/blog/2017/11/9/when-do-innovation-and-evidence-change-lives
dc.relation /*ref*/Haggenson, N. (1990). System Dynamics Combined with Monte Carlo Simulation. Proceeds of the 1990 System Dynamics conference. Recuperado de https://www.systemdynamics.org/assets/conferences/1990/proceed/pdfs/hagen468.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Helbing, D. (Ed.). (2012). Agent-Based Modeling. Social Self-Organization. Understanding Complex Systems. Berlín: Springer.
dc.relation /*ref*/Iacus, S., King, G. y Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr013
dc.relation /*ref*/Jean, N., Burke, M., Xie, M., Davis, M., Lobell, D. y Ermon, S. (2016). Combining Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning to Predict Poverty. Science, 353(6301), 790-794. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf7894
dc.relation /*ref*/Keane, M. y Wolpin, K. (1994). The Solution and Estimation of Discrete Choice Dynamic Programming Models by Simulation: Monte Carlo Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(4), 648-672.
dc.relation /*ref*/Kennedy, W. G., Ihara, E. S., Tompkins, C. J., Inoue, M. y Wolf-Branigin, M. E. (2015). Computational Modeling of Caregiver Stress. Policy and Complex Systems, 2(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.18278/jpcs.2.1.5
dc.relation /*ref*/King, G. y Nielsen, R. (2016). Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching. Gary King. Recuperado de https://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/psnot.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Lee, D. (2005). An Estimable Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of Work, Schooling, and Occupational Choice. International Economic Review, 46(1), 1-34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3663586?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
dc.relation /*ref*/Lee, J. y Chu, C. (2012). Bayesian Clinical Trials in Action. Statistics in Medicine, 31(25), 2955-2972. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5404
dc.relation /*ref*/Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. y Behrens, W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. Nueva York: Universe Books.
dc.relation /*ref*/Michaloupoulos, C. (2012). A Bayesian Reanalysis of Results from the Hard-to-Employ Demonstration and Evaluation Project. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation (OPRE) – Administration for Children and Families – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/bayesian_reanalysis.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Mullainathan, S. (2 de abril de 2016). Satellite Images Can Pinpoint Poverty Where Surveys Can’t. The New York Times. Recuperado de https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/upshot/satellite-images-can-pinpoint-poverty-where-surveys-cant.html
dc.relation /*ref*/Muralidharan, O., Cardin, N., Phillips, T. y Najmi, A. (31 de enero de 2017). Causality in Machine Learning. [Mensaje en un blog]. Recuperado de http://www.unofficialgoogledatascience.com/2017/01/causality-in-machine-learning.html
dc.relation /*ref*/Orloff, J. y Bloom, J. (2014). Comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian Inference. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Recuperado de https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-05-introduction-to-probability-and-statistics-spring-2014/readings/MIT18_05S14_Reading20.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Pearl, J. (2001). Causal Inference in Statistics: A Gentle Introduction. Submitted to ComputingScience and Statistics, Proceedings of Interface, 33(1), 1-20. http://ftp.cs.ucla.edu/pub/stat_ser/R289.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Pearl, J. (2003). Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Econometric Theory, 19(4), 675-685. Pritchett, L. y Sandfur, J. (2013). Context Matters for Size: Why External Validity Claims and Development Practice Don’t Mix. Center for Global Development. Recuperado de https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/context-matters-for-size_1.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Ramsey, F. (1928). A Mathematical Theory of Saving. The Economic Journal, 38(152), 543-559.
dc.relation /*ref*/Rand, W. (2017). Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling. Complexity Explorer – Santa Fe Institute. Recuperado de https://abm.complexityexplorer.org
dc.relation /*ref*/Ros, J. (2012). La Teoría General de Keynes y la macroeconomía moderna. Investigación económica, 71(279), 19-37.
dc.relation /*ref*/Salazar, C. (2009). La evaluación y el análisis de políticas públicas. Ópera, 9, 23-51.
dc.relation /*ref*/Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Nueva York: W.W Norton.
dc.relation /*ref*/Simon, R. (1999). Bayesian Design and Analysis of Active Control Clinical Trials. Biometrics, 55(2), 484-487.
dc.relation /*ref*/Spiegelhalter, D. y Freedman, L. (1994). Bayesian Approaches to Randomized Trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 157(3), 357-416.
dc.relation /*ref*/Tang, D., Agarwal, A., O’Brien, D. y Meyer, M. (2010). Overlapping Experiment Infrastructure: More, Better, Faster Experimentation. Google. Recuperado de https://research.google.com/pubs/pub36500.html
dc.relation /*ref*/Todd, P. y Wolpin, K. (2008). Ex-ante Evaluation of Social Programs. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique, 91/92, 263-291.
dc.relation /*ref*/Wilensky, U. y Rand, W. (2015). An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling: Modeling Natural, Social, and Engineered Complex Systems with NetLogo. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
dc.rights Derechos de autor 2018 Ensayos de Economía es-ES
dc.rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 es-ES
dc.source Ensayos de Economía; Vol. 28 No. 53 (2018); 15-35 en-US
dc.source Ensayos de Economía; Vol. 28 Núm. 53 (2018); 15-35 es-ES
dc.source Ensayos de Economía; Vol. 28 No. 53 (2018); 15-35 fr-CA
dc.source 2619-6573
dc.source 0121-117X
dc.subject Public policy en-US
dc.subject evaluation en-US
dc.subject development en-US
dc.subject bayesian networks en-US
dc.subject computer-based modelling en-US
dc.subject randomised experiment en-US
dc.subject Economics en-US
dc.subject Development economics en-US
dc.subject Policy evaluation en-US
dc.subject políticas públicas es-ES
dc.subject evaluación es-ES
dc.subject desarrollo es-ES
dc.subject redes bayesianas es-ES
dc.subject modelación computarizada es-ES
dc.subject experimento aleatorizado es-ES
dc.subject Economía es-ES
dc.subject Economía del desarrollo es-ES
dc.subject Evaluación de políticas públicas es-ES
dc.subject Économie fr-CA
dc.subject Économie du développement fr-CA
dc.subject Évaluation des politiques publiques fr-CA
dc.title Current Trends in Public Policy Evaluation en-US
dc.title Tendencias actuales en la evaluación de políticas públicas es-ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta