Repositorio Dspace

Colombia’s 2016 Plebiscite: Framing, Cultural Resonance and Political Communication in Facebook Visual Content

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creator Cárdenas, Juan David
dc.date 2021-10-05
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-22T20:01:27Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-22T20:01:27Z
dc.identifier https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cienciapol/article/view/88278
dc.identifier 10.15446/cp.v16n31.88278
dc.identifier.uri http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/102892
dc.description Social networks played a fundamental role in the development of the public debate in the electoral process of the 2016 plebiscite in Colombia. The dissemination of content of different nature, through videos on the social network Facebook, sought to persuade audiences regarding their intention to vote, the legitimacy of the process and the values at stake. This article shows the results of a quantitative analysis, and a qualitative content analysis, within that universe of 20 political leaders of the Si and No political alliances during the campaign to endorse or deny the peace agreements in Colombia in 2016. The results demonstrate strategies of persuasion based on the use of culturally resonant values, the weight of the prestige and legitimacy of the issuers and the relevance of the use of emotions for the electoral political mobilization. en-US
dc.description Las redes sociales tuvieron un papel fundamental en el desarrollo del debate público de las posiciones enfrentadas en el proceso electoral del plebiscito del 2016 en Colombia. La difusión de contenido de distinta naturaleza, a través de videos en la red social Facebook, buscaba persuadir a las audiencias con relación a su intención de voto, la legitimidad del proceso y los valores en juego. Este artículo muestra los resultados de un análisis cuantitativo y cualitativo con mayor influencia dentro de dicho universo de veinte líderes políticos de los bloques del Sí y el No durante la campaña de refrendación de los Acuerdos de Paz en Colombia en 2016. Los resultados evidencian las estrategias de persuasión basadas en el uso de valores culturalmente resonantes, el peso que tiene el prestigio y la legitimidad de los emisores, y la relevancia del uso de emociones en el marco de la movilización político electoral. es-ES
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language spa
dc.publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas y Sociales - Departamento de Ciencias Políticas es-ES
dc.relation https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cienciapol/article/view/88278/81358
dc.relation /*ref*/Aarøe, L. (2011). Investigating Frame Strength: The Case of Episodic and Thematic Frames. Political Communication, 28(2), 207-226. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.568041
dc.relation /*ref*/Andersen, K., y Medaglia, R. (2009). The Use of Facebook in National Election Campaigns: Politics as Usual? En A. Macintosh y E. Tambouris (Eds.), Electronic Participation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 101-111). Berlin: Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03781-8_10
dc.relation /*ref*/Anduiza, E., Perea, E., Jensen, M. y Jorba, L. (2012). Digital Media and Political Engagement Worldwide: A Comparative Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Bennett, W. L. (2012). The Personalization of Politics: Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20-39. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428
dc.relation /*ref*/Berinsky, A. y Kinder, D. (2006). Making Sense of Issues Through Media Frames: Understanding the Kosovo Crisis. Journal of Politics, 68(3). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00451.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Bode, L. (2012). Facebooking It to the Polls: A Study in Online Social Networking and Political Behavior. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 9(4), 352-369. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2012.709045
dc.relation /*ref*/Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the News Feed: Learning Politics from Social Media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24-48. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149
dc.relation /*ref*/Boler, M., y Davis, E. (2018). The Affective Politics of the “Post-Truth” Era: Feeling Rules and Networked Subjects. Emotion, Space and Society, (27), 75-85. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.03.002
dc.relation /*ref*/Bond, R., et al. (2012). A 61-million-person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization. Nature, (489), 295-298. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421
dc.relation /*ref*/Borah, P. (2016). Political Facebook Use: Campaign Strategies Used in 2008 and 2012 Presidential elections. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 13(4), 326-338. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1163519
dc.relation /*ref*/Botero, S. (2017). El plebiscito y los desafíos políticos de consolidar la paz negociada en Colombia. Revista de Ciencia Política, 37(2), 369-388. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2017000200369
dc.relation /*ref*/Bushnell, D. (2007). Colombia: una nación a pesar de si misma: nuestra historia desde los tiempos precolombinos hasta hoy. Bogotá D.C.: Ariel.
dc.relation /*ref*/Callahan, K., Dubnick, M. y Olsnfski, D. (2006). War Narratives: Framing our Understanding of the War on Terror. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 554-568. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00616.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Cardona, L. y Londoño, C. (2018). La retórica del miedo como estrategia política. El plebiscito por la paz en Colombia. Forum, (14), 43-68. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/frdcp.n14.69614
dc.relation /*ref*/Castells, M. (2007). Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication, 40(6), 698-700. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306111425016k
dc.relation /*ref*/Castells, M. (2012). Redes de indignación y esperanza. Madrid: Alianza.
dc.relation /*ref*/Cifuentes, C. y Pino, J. (2018). Conmigo o contra mí: análisis de la concordancia y estrategias temáticas del Centro Democrático en Twitter. Palabra Clave, 21(3), 885-916. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2018.21.3.10
dc.relation /*ref*/Cissel, M. (2012). Media Framing: A Comparative Content Analysis on Mainstream and Alternative News Coverage of Occupy Wall Street. The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 3(1), 67-77. Recuperado de https://vulms.vu.edu.pk/Courses/MCM511/Downloads/08CisselEJSpring12.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Cogburn, D. y Espinoza-Vasquez, F. (2011). From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(1-2), 189-213. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2011.540224
dc.relation /*ref*/CHCV, Comisión Histórica del Conflicto y sus Víctimas (2015). Contribución al entendimiento del conflicto armado en Colombia. Recuperado de https://www.humanas.unal.edu.co/observapazyconflicto/files/5714/6911/9376/Version_final_informes_CHCV.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Davis, M. y Goffman, E. (1975). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Contemporary Sociology, 4(6), 599-603. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2064021
dc.relation /*ref*/de Miera, A., Sánchez, G. y Esguerra, L. (2017). Sociedad civil y paz: reflexiones en torno al plebiscito del 2 de octubre de 2016. Bogotá D.C.: Aurora.
dc.relation /*ref*/Dery, D. (2000). Agenda Setting and Problem Definition. Policy Studies, 21(1), 37-47. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/014428700114008
dc.relation /*ref*/Dimitrova, D., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J. y Nord, L. (2014). The Effects of Digital Media on Political Knowledge and Participation in Election Campaigns: Evidence from Panel Data. Communication Research, 41(1), 95-118. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211426004
dc.relation /*ref*/Domke, D., Shah, D. y Wackman, D. (1998). Media Priming Effects: Accessibility, Association, and Activation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10(1), 51-74. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/10.1.51
dc.relation /*ref*/Effing, R., Van Hillegersberg, J. y Huibers, T. (2011). Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing our Political Systems? En E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh y H. de Bruijn (Eds.), Electronic Participation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 25-35). Berlin: Springer.
dc.relation /*ref*/Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Entman, R. (2003) Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415-432. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176
dc.relation /*ref*/Entman, R. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163-173. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Epstein, L. y Segal, J. (2000). Measuring Issue Salience. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 66-83. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2669293
dc.relation /*ref*/Ericson, R. (1993). Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. By Shanto Iyengar [Book review]. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/230195
dc.relation /*ref*/Ferrara, E., y Yang, Z. (2015). Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media. PLoS ONE, 10(11). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142390
dc.relation /*ref*/Fox, R. y Ramos, J. (2011). iPolitics: Citizens, Elections, and Governing in the New Media Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Fraser, M., y Dutta, S. (2008, nov 19). Barack Obama and the Facebook Election. US News and World Report. Recuperado de https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2008/11/19/barack-obama-and-the-facebook-election
dc.relation /*ref*/Gamson, W. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Gamson, W., y Modigliani, A. (1987). The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action. Research in Political Psychology, (3), 137-177.
dc.relation /*ref*/Gerodimos, R. y Justinussen, J. (2015). Obama’s 2012 Facebook Campaign: PoliticalCommunication in the Age of the Like Button. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 12(2), 113-132. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.982266
dc.relation /*ref*/Gómez-Giraldo, J. y Cárdenas, J. (2019). El papel de la opinión publicada en la prensa escrita colombiana antes del plebiscito del 2 de octubre de 2016. Palabra Clave, 22(1). Doi: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2019.22.1.9
dc.relation /*ref*/Gómez-Suárez, A. (2016). El triunfo del no. La paradoja emocional detrás del plebiscito. Bogotá D.C.: Ícono.
dc.relation /*ref*/González, C. (2016, noviembre 19). Colombia tiene 26 millones de perfiles en Facebook. La República. Recuperado de https://www.larepublica.co/internet-economy/colombia-tiene-26-millones-de-perfiles-en-facebook-2443111
dc.relation /*ref*/González, M. F. (2017). La “posverdad” en el plebiscito por la paz en Colombia. Nueva sociedad, (269), 114-126. Recuperado de https://biblat.unam.mx/hevila/Nuevasociedad/2017/no269/13.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/González, F., Bolívar, I. y Vázquez, T. (2003). Violencia política en Colombia: de la nación fragmentada a la construcción del Estado. Bogotá D.C.: Cinep.
dc.relation /*ref*/Gross, K. (2008). Framing Persuasive Appeals: Episodic and Thematic Framing, Emotional Response, and Policy Opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169-192. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Gulati, G. y Williams, C. (2013). Social Media and Campaign 2012: Developments and Trends for Facebook Adoption. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 577-588. Doi https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313489258
dc.relation /*ref*/Hart, P. (2011). One or many? The Influence of Episodic and Thematic Climate Change Frames on Policy Preferences and Individual Behavior Change. Science Communication, 33(1), 28-51. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010366400
dc.relation /*ref*/Holmes, J. (2009). 21st Century Media Effects: Choice, Predispositions, and their Impact on Agenda Setting and Priming [Disertación de doctorado]. Political Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
dc.relation /*ref*/Housholder, E. y LaMarre, H. (2014). Facebook Politics: Toward a Process Model for Achieving Political Source Credibility Through Social Media. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 11(4), 368-382. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.951753
dc.relation /*ref*/Hutchison, E. y Bleiker, R. (2014). Theorizing Emotions in World Politics. International Theory, 6(3), 491-514. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000232
dc.relation /*ref*/Iyengar, S. (1994). Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Iyengar, S. (1996). Framing Responsibility for Political Issues. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 59-70. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716296546001006
dc.relation /*ref*/Iyengar, S. y Kinder, D. (2010). News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Iyengar, S. y Simon, A. (1993). News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion: A Study of Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing. Communication Research, 20(3), 365-383. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365093020003002
dc.relation /*ref*/Laffan, B. (2014). Framing the Crisis, Defining the Problems: Decoding the Euro Area Crisis. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 15(3), 266-280. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2014.912395
dc.relation /*ref*/Latinobarometro. (2016). Análisis en línea de variable sociodemográfica, Colombia. Recuperado de https://www.latinobarometro.org/latOnline.jsp
dc.relation /*ref*/Lenz, G. (2009). Learning and Opinion Change, not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 821-837. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00403.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Loader, B. y Mercea, D. (2012). Social media and democracy: Innovations in participatory politics. London: Routledge.
dc.relation /*ref*/Maldonado, M. (2017). La democracia sentimental: política y emociones en el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Página indómita.
dc.relation /*ref*/Marcus, G. (2000). Emotions in Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 221-250. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.221
dc.relation /*ref*/McCombs, M. (2002). The Agenda-Setting Role of the Mass Media in Shaping Public Opinion [archivo personal]. Disponible en https://www.infoamerica.org/documentos_pdf/mccombs01.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/McCombs, M. y Ghanem, S. (2001). The Convergence of Agenda Setting and Framing. En S. Resse, Jr. Gandy y A. Grant (Eds), Framing Public Life Perspectives on Media and our Understanding of the Social World. London: Routledge.
dc.relation /*ref*/Melo, J. (1990). Algunas consideraciones globales sobre “modernidad” y “modernización” en el caso colombiano. Análisis Político, (10), 24-41. Recuperado de https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/anpol/article/view/74299/67114
dc.relation /*ref*/Nussbaum, M. (2014). Emociones políticas: ¿Por qué el amor es importante para la justicia? [Trad. A. Santos]. Barcelona: Paidós.
dc.relation /*ref*/Otero, S. (2008, marzo 21). La Iglesia como actor de la gobernanza en Colombia. Reseña de dos textos claves sobre el rol de la Iglesia desde el siglo XX. Irg. Recuperado de http://www.institut-gouvernance.org/es/document/fiche-document-148.html
dc.relation /*ref*/Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Palacios, M., y Safford, F. (2002). Colombia: país fragmentado, sociedad dividida: su historia. Bogotá D.C.: Norma.
dc.relation /*ref*/Pardo, J. (2016, octubre 4). El No ha sido la campaña mas barata y más efectiva de la historia. Asuntos legales. Recuperado de https://www.asuntoslegales.com.co/actualidad/el-no-ha-sido-la-campana-mas-barata-y-mas-efectiva-de-la-historia-2427891
dc.relation /*ref*/Parsons, B. (2010). Social Networks and the Affective Impact of Political Disagreement. Political Behavior, (32), 181-204. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-009-9100-6
dc.relation /*ref*/Pécaut, D. (1991). Colombia: violencia y democracia. Análisis político, (13), 35-50. Recuperado de https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/anpol/article/download/74721/67473/396902
dc.relation /*ref*/Pedrozo, P. V. H., y Granados, J. D. R. (2020). Análisis del concepto de posverdad en las elecciones colombianas del plebiscito por la paz: detalles retóricos, lingüísticos, bioéticos y biopolíticos. Infometric@ - Serie Sociales y Humanas, 3(1), 42-80. Recuperado de http://infometrica.org/index.php/ssh/article/view/106
dc.relation /*ref*/Pennington, N., Winfrey, K., Warner, B. y Kearney, M. (2015). Liking Obama and Romney (on Facebook): An Experimental Evaluation of Political Engagement and Efficacy During the 2012 General Election. Computers in Human Behavior, (44), 279-283. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.032
dc.relation /*ref*/Peña, R., Brunet, M. y Laguna, J. (2017). La calidad de la información periodística de elespectador.com. El caso del Plebiscito por la Paz, 2016 en Colombia. Revista latina de comunicación social, (72), 1502-1514. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1231
dc.relation /*ref*/Hernández, M. (2017). El triunfo del No: la paradoja emocional detrás del plebiscito. Ciudad Paz-ando, 10(2), 92-96. Doi: https://doi.org/10.14483/2422278X.12218
dc.relation /*ref*/Perilla, D. (2018). La plebitusa: movilización política de las emociones posplebiscito por la paz en Colombia. Maguaré, 32(2), 153-181. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/mag.v32n2.77012
dc.relation /*ref*/Polat, R. K. (2005). The Internet and Political Participation: Exploring the Explanatory Links. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 435-459. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058251
dc.relation /*ref*/Price, V. y Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. En G. Barret y F. Boster (Eds.), Progress in the Communication Sciences (pp. 173-212). New York: Ablex.
dc.relation /*ref*/Quintero, J. y Marín, A. (2018). Proceso de paz y post-acuerdo en Colombia: expresiones de confianza en Twitter. El Ágora USB, 18(2). 348-361. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/agor/v18n2/1657-8031-agor-18-02-348.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Reese, S. (2001). Framing Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research. En S. Reese, O. Gandy y A. Grant (Eds.), Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding of the Social World (pp. 7-31). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum
dc.relation /*ref*/Richardson, G. (Ed.). (2016). Social Media and Politics: A New Way to Participate in the Political Process. Westport: Praeger.
dc.relation /*ref*/Riorda, M., y Farré, M. (2012). ¡Ey, las ideologías existen!: comunicación política y campañas electorales en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Biblos.
dc.relation /*ref*/Ríos, I., Pérez-Marín, M. y Morillo, S. (2018). La agenda setting en la red social Facebook: Campaña del plebiscito por la paz en Colombia. Kepes, 15(17), 93-117. Recuperado de https://investigaciones-pure.udem.edu.co/es/publications/la-agenda-setting-en-la-red-social-facebook-campa%C3%B1a-del-plebiscit
dc.relation /*ref*/Robertson, S., Vatrapu, R. y Medina, R. (2010). Off the Wall Political Discourse: Facebook use in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election. Information Polity, 15(1-2), 11-31. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2010-0196
dc.relation /*ref*/Roncallo-Dow, S., Cárdenas, J. y Gómez, J. (2019). Nosotros, Colombia… Comunicación, paz y (pos) conflicto. Medellín: Editorial EAFIT.
dc.relation /*ref*/Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. y Carpentier, F. (2009). Media Priming: An Updated Synthesis. En J. Bryant y M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Routledge.
dc.relation /*ref*/Ruano, L. y Muñoz, L. (2019). Plebiscito por la paz en Colombia: un análisis desde las emociones en sus resultados políticos. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional De Comunicación, (44), 110-126. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2019.i44.07
dc.relation /*ref*/Scheufele, D. (2000). Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2-3), 297-316. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07
dc.relation /*ref*/Scheufele, D. y Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 57(1). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Schudson, M. (1989). How Culture Works. Theory and Society, 18(2), 153-180. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/657530
dc.relation /*ref*/Sears, D. (1993). Symbolic politics: a socio-psychological theory. En S. Iyengar y W. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in Political Psychology. Durham: Duke University Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Semetko, H. y Valkenburg, P. (2000), Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication, 50(2) 93-109. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Sheafer, T. (2007). How to Evaluate It: The Role of Story-evaluative Tone in Agenda Setting and Priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 21-39. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00327.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Snow, D., y Benford, R. (1988). Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.
dc.relation /*ref*/Staiger, J., Cvetkovich, A. y Reynolds, A. (2010). Political Emotions. London: Routledge. Stieglitz, S. y Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media–Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217-248. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408
dc.relation /*ref*/Tang, G. y Lee, F. (2013). Facebook Use and Political Participation: The Impact of Exposure to Shared Political Information, Connections with Public Political Actors, and etwork Structural Heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 763-773. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313490625
dc.relation /*ref*/de Vreese, C. (2005). News Framing: Theory and Typology. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 13(1). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
dc.relation /*ref*/de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Framing the Economy: Effects of Journalistic News Frames. En P. D’Angelo y J. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing News Framing Analysis (pp. 203–230). London: Routledge.
dc.relation /*ref*/Weaver, D. (1991). Issue Salience and Public Opinion: Are there Consequences of Agendasetting? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 3(1), 53-68. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/3.1.53
dc.relation /*ref*/Weaver, D. (2007). Thoughts on Agenda Setting, Framing, and Priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142-147. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Weeks, B., Ardèvol-Abreu, A. y Gil, H. (2015). Online Influence? Social Media Use, Opinion Leadership, and Political Persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), 214-239. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv050
dc.relation /*ref*/Williams, R. (2004). The cultural contexts of collective action: Constraints, opportunities, and the symbolic life of social movements. En D. Snow, S. Soule y H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, (pp. 91-115). Hoboken: Blackwell.
dc.relation /*ref*/Wills, D. y Reeves, S. (2009). Facebook as a Political Weapon: Information in Social Networks. British Politics, (4), 265-281. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2009.3
dc.relation /*ref*/World Values Survey (2015). Encuesta Mundial de Valores Colombia. Recuperado de https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Prensa/Publicaciones/EMV%20comparativo%20Word%20cp%2029-03-2016.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Zald, M. (1996). Culture, Ideology, and Strategic Framing. En D. McAdam, J. McCarthy y M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (pp. 261-274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.rights Derechos de autor 2021 Ciencia Política es-ES
dc.rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ es-ES
dc.source Ciencia Política; Vol. 16 No. 31 (2021): Part I: Emotions and politics ; 235-273 en-US
dc.source Ciencia Política; Vol. 16 Núm. 31 (2021): Parte I: Emociones y política; 235-273 es-ES
dc.source Ciencia Política; v. 16 n. 31 (2021): Parte I: Emociones y política; 235-273 pt-BR
dc.source 2389-7481
dc.source 1909-230X
dc.subject comunicación es-ES
dc.subject elecciones es-ES
dc.subject persuasión es-ES
dc.subject plebiscito es-ES
dc.subject redes sociales es-ES
dc.subject Ciencia Política es-ES
dc.subject Redes sociales es-ES
dc.subject procesos electorales es-ES
dc.subject ciencia política es-ES
dc.subject Communication en-US
dc.subject Elections en-US
dc.subject Persuasion en-US
dc.subject Plebiscite en-US
dc.subject Social Media en-US
dc.subject Political Science en-US
dc.subject Social network en-US
dc.subject electoral process en-US
dc.subject political science en-US
dc.title Colombia’s 2016 Plebiscite: Framing, Cultural Resonance and Political Communication in Facebook Visual Content en-US
dc.title El plebiscito del 2016 en Colombia: Framing, resonancia cultural y comunicación política en los contenidos visuales de Facebook es-ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type peer-reviewed article en-US
dc.type Research Article en-US
dc.type Artículo evaluado por pares es-ES
dc.type Artículo de investigación es-ES
dc.coverage Colombia en-US
dc.coverage Colombia es-ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta