Repositorio Dspace

The civil law problem in the international recognition of gay adoptions from the viewpoint of comparative law of the civil law and angloamerican systems

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creator Casanueva Sánchez, Isidoro
dc.date 2021-12-15
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-22T19:55:03Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-22T19:55:03Z
dc.identifier https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/peju/article/view/99266
dc.identifier.uri http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/102417
dc.description Gay adoptions are a recent phenomenon that suggest many questions, from its conception to its international recognition that may introduce conflicts among fundamental rights, internally and internationally. This text addresses some tensions and discussions that have arisen in doctrine and jurisprudence together with their practical implications en-US
dc.description La adopción de menores por parejas homosexuales es un fenómeno reciente que plantea numerosos interrogantes, tanto desde su concepción, aceptación y reconocimiento internacional, que pueden generar conflictos entre derechos fundamentales, a nivel interno pero también a nivel internacional. En este texto se abordan algunas tensiones y discusiones surgidas en la doctrina y la jurisprudencia junto a sus implicaciones prácticas. es-ES
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format text/html
dc.language spa
dc.publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Derecho, Ciencias Políticas y Sociales es-ES
dc.relation https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/peju/article/view/99266/82184
dc.relation https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/peju/article/view/99266/82756
dc.relation /*ref*/Adams, William E. “Whose family is it anyway? The continuous struggle of lesbians and gay men seeking to adopt children”, en New England Law Review, vol. 30, No. 3, 1995, pp. 579-622. Appell, Annette R. “The endurance of the biological connection: Heteronormativity, same sex parenting and the lessons of adoption”, en Brigham Young University Journal of Public Policy, vol. 22, No. 2, 2008, pp. 289-325. Arader, Jared B. “Chambers v. Ormiston: The harmful and discriminatory avoidance of the laws of comity and public policy for valid same sex marriages”, en Roger Williams University Law Review, vol. 15, No. 1, 2010, pp. 187-216. Ball, Carlos. “The Immorality of Statutory Restrictions on Adoption by Lesbians and Gay Men”, en Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal, vol. 38, No. 2, 2007, pp. 379-397. Blanc, Myriam. Et elles eurent beaucoup d’enfants. Histoire d’une famille homoparentale. Manosque, Le Bec en l'Air, 2005. Brodzinski, David M. y Schechter, Marshall D. The psycology of adoption, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 1990. Bryant, Suzanne. “Second parent adoption: A model brief”, en Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy, vol. 2, No. 1, 1995, pp. 233-241. Cahn, Naomi. “The moral complexities of family law”, en Stanford Law Review, vol. 50, No. 1, 1997, pp. 225-271. Cahn, Naomi. “Perfect Substitutes or the Real Things?”, en Duke Law Journal, vol. 52, No. 6, 2003, pp. 1077-1166. Cantor, Donald et al. Same sex marriage: The psychological evolution in America, Middletown, Wesleyan University Press, 2006. Carp, Wayne E. Family matters: Secrecy and disclosure in the history of adoption, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1998. Christensen, Craig W. “Legal ordering of family values: The case of gay and lesbian families, en Cardozo Law Review, vol. 18, No. 4, 1997, pp. 1299-1416. De Oliveira, Mariana y Bortolozzi, Ana Cláudia. Adopçao por homossexuais. A familia homoparental sob o olhar da psicología juridica, Curitiba, Juruá, 2009. Dethloff, Nina. “Same-Sex Parents in a Comparative Perspective”, en International Law Forum, vol. 7, No. 3, 2005, pp. 195-205. DOI: 10.1163/157180405774580008 Elovitz, Marc E y Schneider, Cynthia. Legal issues facing the nontraditional family, Nueva York, Practising Law Institute, 1995. Elovitz, Marc E. “Adoption by lesbian and gay people: the use and misuse of social science research”, en Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy, vol. 2, No. 1, 1995, pp. 207-215. Elovitz, Marc E. “Adoption by lesbian and gay people”. En: Elovitz, Marc E. y Schneider, Cynthia. Legal issues facing the nontraditional family. Nueva York, Practising Law Institute, 1995, p. 171-191. Ellman, Ira M. “Thinking about custody and support in ambiguous father families”. En Family Law Quarterly, vol. 36, 2002, pp. 49-78. Evall, Joseph. “Sexual orientation and adoption matching”, en Family Law Quarterly, vol. 25, No. 3, 1991, pp. 347-379. Field, Martha A. Surrogate motherhood, Cambridge, Harvard, University Press, 1988. Forman, Deborah. “Interstate recognition of same sex parents in the wake of gay marriage, civil unions and domestic partnerships”. En Boston College Law Review, vol. 46, No. 1, 2004, pp. 1-81. García Rubio, María Paz. “La adopción por y en parejas homosexuales”, en Libro Homenaje al Profesor Luis Puig Ferriol. Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch, 2006- Garrison, Marsha. “Law Making for Baby Making: An Interpretive Approach to the Determination of Legal Parentage”, en Harvard Law Review, vol. 113, No. 4, 2000, pp. 835-923. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342435 Garrison, Marsha. “Surrogate parenting: What should legislatures do?”, en Family law quarterly, vol. 22, No. 2, 1988, pp. 149-172. Gatos, Pamela. “Third parent adoption in lesbian and gay families”, en Vermont Law Review, vol. 26, No 1, 2001, pp. 195-220. Goldstein, Joseph, et al. The best interests of the child: the least detrimental alternative, Nueva York, Free Press, 1998. Green, Samuel y Long, John. Marriage and family law agreements, Colorado Springs, Shepard's/McGraw-Hill, 1984. Green, Vincent C. “Same sex adoption. An alternative approach to gay marriage in New York”, en Brooklyn Law Review, vol. 62, No. 1, 1996, pp. 399-429. Hodson, David. A Practical Guide to International Family Law, Bristol, Family Law, 2008. Joslin, Courtney G. “Interstate Recognition of Parentage in a Time of Disharmony: Same-Sex Parent Families and Beyond”, en Ohio State Law Journal, vol. 70, No. 3, 2009, pp. 563-617. Leonard, Arthur S. Sexuality and the law, Nueva York, Routledge, 1993. Lieberman, Martha E. “The status of same sex adoption in the keystone state subsequent to the state supreme court’s decision in Adoption of R.B.F. and R.C.G.”, en Journal of Law and Policy, vol. 12, No. 1, 2003, pp. 287-325. Lin, Timothy E. “Social norms and judicial decision-making: Examining the role of narratives in same sex adoption cases”. En Columbia Law Review, vol. 99, No 3, 1999, pp. 739-794. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123520 Lowe, Nigel V., Everall, Mark y Nichols, Michael. International movement of children: law practice and procedure, Bristol, Family Law, 2004. Maldonado, Maria Tereza. Os caminhos do coraçâo: pais e filos adotivos, Sâo Paulo, Saraiva, 2001. Mallon, Gerald. Lesbian & gay foster and adoptive parents. Recruiting, assessing and supporting an untapped resource for children and youth, Washington, Child Welfare League of America, 2006. Markens, Susan. Surrogate motherhood and the politics of reproduction, Berkeley, University of California Press, 2007. Merino, Faith. Adoption and surrogate pregnancy, Nueva York, Facts on File, 2010. Michael. “Approaching same sex marriage: How second-parent adoption cases can help courts achieve the best interest of the same-sex family”. En Connecticut Law Review, 2003. O’Halloran, Kerry. The politics of adoption: International perspectives on law, policy and practice, Dordretch, Springer, 2006. Olson, Christine L. “Second Class Families: Interstate Recognition of Queer Adoption”, en Family Law Querterly, vol. 43, No. 1, 2009, pp. 161-180. Otero Varela, Alfonso. Dos estudios histórico jurídicos: el riepto en el derecho castellano-leonés; la adopción en la historia del Derecho español, Roma y Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Delegación de Roma, 1955. Polikoff, Nancy. “This child does have two mothers: redefining parenthood to meet the needs of children in lesbian-mother and other nontraditional families”, en Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 78, No. 3, 1990, pp. 459-576. Posner, Richard A. “The ethics and economics of enforcing contracts of surrogate motherhood”, en Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, vol. 5, No. 1, 1989, pp. 21-31. Rekers, George A. “An empirically supported rational basis for prohibiting adoption, foster parenting and and contested child custody for any person residing in a household that includes a homosexually behaving member”, en Saint Thomas Law Review, vol. 18, No. 2, 2005, pp. 325-424. Rivero Hernández. El interés del menor, Madrid, Dykinson, 2000. Roberts, Dorothy E. “The Genetic Tie”, en University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 62, No. 1, 1995, pp. 209-273. Romano, Rosanne L. “Intercountry adoption: An overview for the practitioner”, en Transnational Lawyer, vol. 7, No. 2, 1994, pp. 545-582. Roski, Clifford J. “Like father, like son: homosexuality, parenthood, and the gender of homophobia”, en Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, vol. 20, No. 2, 2009, pp. 257-282. Ross, Spencer. “Finstuen v. crutcher: the tenth circuit delivers a significant victory for same-sex parents with adopted children”, en Denver University Law Review, vol. 85, No. 3, 2008, pp. 685-700. Sandel, Michael J. Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?, Nueva York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009. Scarman, Justice. “English law and foreign adoptions”, en International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 11, No. 3, 1962, pp. 635-664. Schacter, Jane. “Constructing families in a democracy: Courts, legislatures and second parent adoption”, en Chicago Kent Law Review, vol. 75, No. 3, 2000, pp. 933-950. Schuck, Peter H. “The social utility of surrogacy”, en Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, vol. 22, No. 2, 1990, pp. 132-138. Seymore. “International adoption and international comity: When is adoption repugnant?”, en Texas Wesleyan Law Review, vol. 10, 2005, pp. 381-401. Shanley, Mary Lyndon. Making babies, making families. What matters most in an age of reproductive technologies, surrogacy, adoption and same-sex and unwed parents, Boston, Beacon, 2001. Silva Junior, Enézio de Deus. A possibilidade juridica de adoçâo por casais homossexuais. Curitiba, Juruá, 2008. Solé Resina, Judith. “Adopción y parejas homosexuales”, en Navas Navarro, Susana. Matrimonio homosexual y adopción, Madrid, Reus, 2006. Spar, Debora. “For the love and money: The political economy of commercial surrogacy”, en Review of international political economy, vol. 12, No. 2, 2005, pp. 287-309. Spector, Robert G. “The Unconstitutionality of Oklahoma's Statute Denying Recognition to Adoptions by Same-Sex Couples from Other States”, en Tulsa Law Review, vol. 40, No. 3, 2005, pp. 467-478. Stacey, Judith y Biblarz, Timothy J. “(How) Does the Sexual Orientation of Parents Matter?”, en American Sociological Review, vol. 66, No. 2, 2001, pp. 159-183. Stumpf, Andrea E. “Redefining mother: A legal matrix for new reproductive technologies”, en Yale Law Journal, vol. 96, No. 1, 1986, pp. 187-208. Tobias, Sarah. “Several steps behind: Gay and lesbian adoptions”, en Haslanger, Sally y Witt, Charlotte. Adoptions matters: Philosophical and feminist essays. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2005, pp. 95-111. Vlaardingerbroek, Paul. “Trends on (inter-country) adoptions by gay and lesbian couples in western Europe”, en Saint Thomas Law Review, vol. 18, 2005, pp. 495-502. Wardle, Lynn. “Considering the impact on children and society of lesbigay parenting”, en Quarterly Law Journal, vol. 23, No. 2, 2004, pp. 558-566. Wardle, Lynn. “A critical analysis of interstate recognition of lesbian-gay adoptions”. En Ave Maria Law Review, vol. 3, No. 2, 2005, pp. 561-617. Wardle, Lynn. “The Hague convention on intercountry adoption and american implementing law: Implications for international adoptions by gay and lesbian couples or partners”, en Indiana International and Comparative Law Review, vol. 18, No. 1, 2008, pp. 113-152. Wardle, Lynn. “Comparative perspectives on adoption of children by cohabiting, nonmarital couples and partners”, en Arkansas Law Review, vol. 63, 2010, pp. 31-112. Wilkins, Richard G., Christensen, Trent y Selden, Eric. “Adult sexual desire and the best interest of the child”, en Saint Thomas Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2005, pp. 543-680.
dc.rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 es-ES
dc.source Pensamiento Jurídico; Vol. 1 Núm. 53 (2021): Análisis desde la teoría y la sociología jurídica es-ES
dc.source Pensamiento Jurídico; Vol. 1 No. 53 (2021): Analysis from legal theory and sociology en-US
dc.source 2357-6170
dc.source 0122-1108
dc.subject Adoption en-US
dc.subject Civil law en-US
dc.subject Human rights en-US
dc.subject International recognition of acts en-US
dc.subject Law en-US
dc.subject Law en-US
dc.subject Adopción es-ES
dc.subject Derecho civil es-ES
dc.subject Derechos fundamentales es-ES
dc.subject Reconocimiento internacional de actos jurídicos es-ES
dc.subject Derecho es-ES
dc.subject Derecho es-ES
dc.title The civil law problem in the international recognition of gay adoptions from the viewpoint of comparative law of the civil law and angloamerican systems en-US
dc.title La problemática para el derecho civil de la aplicación del reconocimiento internacional de las adopciones por parejas homosexuales desde el punto de vista del derecho comparado de en los sistemas civilístico y angloamericano es-ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type Artículo revisado por pares es-ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta