Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

  1. Repositorio institucional de CLACSO
  2. Colección de los Centros Asociados
  3. Brasil
  4. Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - FFC/UNESP - Cosecha
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/73264
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorNegru, Teodor-
dc.date2012-08-03-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T18:05:53Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T18:05:53Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/2472-
dc.identifier10.1590/S0101-31732012000200006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/73264-
dc.descriptionThe debate surrounding the way in which Heidegger and Blumenberg understand the modern age is an opportunity to discuss two different approaches to history. On one hand, from Heidegger’s perspective, history should be understood as starting from how Western thought related to Being, which, in metaphysical thinking, took the form of the forgetfulness of Being. Thus, the modern age represents the last stage in the process of forgetfulness of Being, which announces the moment of the rethinking of the relationship with Being by appealing to the authentic disclosure of Being. On the other hand, Blumenberg understands history as the result of the reoccupation process, which means replacing old theories with other new ones. Thus, to the historical approach it is not important to identify epochs as periods of time between two events, but to think about the discontinuities occurring throughout history. Starting from here, the modern age will be thought of not as an expression of the radicalization of the forgetfulness of Being, but as a response to the crises of medieval conceptions. For the same reason, the interpretation of history as a history of the forgetfulness of Being is considered by Blumenberg to subordinate history to an absolute principle, without taking into account its protagonists’ needs and necessities.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagepor-
dc.publisherFaculdade de Filosofia e Ciênciaspt-BR
dc.relationhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/2472/2010-
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofiapt-BR
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0pt-BR
dc.sourceTRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 35 No. 02 (2012); 93-120en-US
dc.sourceTRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; v. 35 n. 02 (2012); 93-120pt-BR
dc.source1980-539X-
dc.source0101-3173-
dc.subjectAnthropology. Blumenberg. Heideggerpt-BR
dc.titleHeidegger and blumenberg on modernitypt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - FFC/UNESP - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.