Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/246497
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorPele, Antonio-
dc.date2016-08-31-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-30T19:33:19Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-30T19:33:19Z-
dc.identifierhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/9782-
dc.identifier10.18593/ejjl.v17i2.9782-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/246497-
dc.descriptionIn this article, I intend to reframe and qualify Kant’s moral philosophy for the understanding human dignity. Some Kant’s formulas seem to grant to the human being an inherent and absolute worthiness, when they are read (often) in a very decontextualized way. To achieve this objective, I identify the basic characteristics we commonly attribute to the contemporary model of human dignity. This model has some expressions in the axiological field (inherent and absolute worth), and, at the same time, in the legal-political field (cornerstone of human rights and guiding principle of the Rule of law). I intend to see if we can find some of these latter characteristics in the mentioned usages that Kant gives to the term “dignity” and of formulas supposedly connected (“end in itself”, “autonomy”, “humanity”). When contextualizing these expressions, either in the motivations or in the results of Kant’s philosophy, I arrived to the conclusion that Kant was less concerned with the intrinsic worthiness of the human beings, than with establishing the authority of morality.Keywords: Categorical imperative. Human dignity. Humanity. Kant. Rights. es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherUniversidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESCpt-BR
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/9782/pdf-
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2016 Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law [EJJL] - Qualis A2pt-BR
dc.sourceEspaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 17 Nr. 2 (2016): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] | Quadrimestral; 493-512de-DE
dc.sourceEspaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2016): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] | Quadrimestral; 493-512en-US
dc.sourceEspaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2016): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] | Quadrimestral; 493-512es-ES
dc.sourceEspaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2016): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] | Quadrimestral; 493-512fr-CA
dc.sourceEspaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 17 n. 2 (2016): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] | Quadrimestral; 493-512pt-BR
dc.source2179-7943-
dc.source1519-5899-
dc.titleKANT ON HUMAN DIGNITY: A CRITICAL APPROACH -- KANT E A DIGNIDADE HUMANA: UMA INTERPRETAÇÃO CRÍTICAes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeAvaliado por Parespt-BR
Aparece en las colecciones: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGD/UNOESC - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.