Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/185642Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Clados, Christiane | - |
| dc.creator | Goletz, Anne | - |
| dc.creator | Halbmayer, Ernst | - |
| dc.date | 2022-09-16 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:50:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:50:25Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/REAA/article/view/79187 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/reaa.79187 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/185642 | - |
| dc.description | Many studies, even those conducted in the field of the Americas, still argue that graphic communication necessarily builds on coding units of speech. However, in recent years, there has been a growing awareness of the narrowness of this concept by focusing on Indigenous and pre-Columbian societies, who favore(d) non-glottographic systems over written speech. This paper concerns the development of a semiological multidimensional theory and methodology to analyze Indigenous Graphic Communication Systems (GCSs) in Mesoamerica, Amazonia, the Isthmo-Colombian Area and the Central Andes. The aim of this theory and methodology is to understand how and in what ways Indigenous societies communicate and encode knowledge using graphic units. Placing emic concepts and epistemologies increasingly at the center of the investigation comes with a rethinking of Western concepts of writing, and a change of perspective. The proposed model provides access to new analytical dimensions that have not been considered in an integrated way so far. Graphic units are not only studied in relation to each other and on the semantic level, but in the broader context in which they arise. Three examples are used to demonstrate the complexity of graphic communication based on semasiographic principles and test the proposed approach focusing on various forms of Yukpa graphic expressions in Colombia and Venezuela and framed graphic units of the Tiwanaku culture in the Central Andes, Peru. | en-US |
| dc.description | Muchos estudios, incluso aquellos realizados bajo el enfoque de las Américas, siguen sosteniendo que la comunicación gráfica se basa necesariamente en la codificación de unidades de habla. Sin embargo, en los últimos años se ha tomado conciencia de la limitación de este concepto al centrarse en sociedades indígenas y precolombinas, que han favorecido los sistemas no glotográficos frente al habla escrita. Este artículo se dedica a desarrollar una teoría y metodología semiológica multidimensional para analizar los Sistemas de Comunicación Gráfica (SCG) indígena en Mesoamérica, la Amazonía, el Área Istmo-Colombiana y los Andes Centrales. El objetivo de esa teoría y metodología es comprender cómo y de qué manera las sociedades indígenas comunican y codifican sus conocimientos mediante unidades gráficas. Poner los conceptos émicos y las epistemologías propias cada vez más como el centro de la investigación conlleva un replanteamiento de los conceptos occidentales de la escritura y un cambio de perspectiva. El modelo propuesto en este artículo plantea nuevas dimensiones analíticas que hasta ahora no se han considerado de forma integrada. Las unidades gráficas no sólo se estudian al relacionarlas entre sí y bajo un nivel semántico, sino en el contexto más amplio que les da origen. Tres ejemplos de aplicación ilustradas demuestran la complejidad de la comunicación gráfica basada en principios semasiográficos y ponen a prueba el enfoque propuesto bajo varias formas de expresiones gráficas de los yukpa en Colombia y Venezuela y unidades gráficas encuadrados de la cultura Tiwanaku en los Andes centrales, Perú. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Ediciones Complutense | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/REAA/article/view/79187/4564456561254 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Alva, Walter and Christopher B. Donnan. 1993. Royal Tombs of Sipan. Los Angeles: Fowler Museum of Cultural History. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Angenot, Valérie. 2021. “Tropological Semiotics: Peirce’s Ontic Levels and the Tropes. Synecdoche - metonymy - metaphor”, Presentation in Workshop of AmerGraph Group/Research Project More Than Writing. March 16 2021. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bateson, Gregory. 1979. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: E.P. Dutton. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Berlo, Janet Catherine. 1989. “Early Writing in Central Mexico: In Tlilli, In Tlapalli, before A.D. 1000”, in Mesoamerica after the Decline of Teotihuacan, A.D. 700-900, Richard A. Diehl and Janet Catherine Berlo, eds., pp. 19-47. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bolinder, Gustaf. 1917. “Einiges Über Die Motilon-Indianer Der Sierra De Perija”. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 49 (1): 21–51. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Boone, H. Elizabeth and Walter D. Mignolo. 1994. “Writing and Recording Knowledge”, in Writing Without Words: Alternative Literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes, Elizabeth H. Boone and Walter D. Mignolo, eds., pp. 3-26. Durham: Duke University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Brokaw, Galen. 2010. “Indigenous American Polygraphy and the Dialogic Model of Media”. Ethnohistory 57 (1): 117–33. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Brokaw, Galen. 2014. “Semiotics, Aesthetics, and the Quechua Concept of Quilca”, in Colonial Mediascapes: Sensory Worlds in the Early Americas”, Matt Cohen and Jeffrey Glover, eds., pp. 166-202. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Chrisomalis, Stephen. 2020. Reckonings. Numerals, Cognition, and History. Cambridge: The MIT Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Clados, Christiane. 2001. Der Nasca-Ikonenkomplex. Seine mythischen Gestalten und ihre Entwicklung, erschlossen aus den Darstellungen gegenständlicher Bildwerke (Nasca Iconography. Its Mythical Beings and their Development, based on the Analysis of Pictorial Objects). Ph.D. dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Clados, Christiane. 2007. “A Key Checkerboard Pattern Tunic of the Linden Museum, Stuttgart: First Steps in Breaking the Tocapu Code?” Tribus 56: 71–106. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Clados, Christiane. 2009. “New Perspectives on Tiwanaku Iconography”, in Tiwanaku. Papers from the 2005 Mayer Center Symposium at the Denver Art Museum, Margaret Young-Sánchez, ed., pp. 101-114. Denver: Denver Art Museum. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Clados, Christiane. 2016. Bildkulturelle Transformationen und Gestaltung in den Zentralanden (Transformations and Formations in Central Andean Visual Culture) Habilitation Thesis, Philipps-Universität Marburg. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Clados, Christiane. 2019. “On the Iconic Approach of Tocapus”, in Indigenous Graphic Communication Systems. A Theoretical Approach, Katarzyna Mikulska and Jerome A. Offner, eds., pp. 233-256. Louisville: University Press of Colorado. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Clados, Christiane. 2021. “A Tiwanaku bone tube of the Ethnologisches Museum Berlin”. Article in press, Baessler-Archiv. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cohen, Matt and Jeffrey Glover, eds. 2014. Colonial Mediascapes. Sensory Worlds of the Early Americas. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cook, Noble David. 1981. Demographic Collapse. Indian Peru, 1520-1620. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cruxent, José María. 1952. “Notes on Venezuelan Archeology”, in Indian Tribes of Aboriginal America. Chicago, Sol Tax, ed., pp. 280-294. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. 2018. The End of the Cognitive Empire. The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham, London: Duke University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/DeFrancis, John. 1989. Visible speech. The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dehouve, Danièle. 2019. “The ‘Law of the Series’: A Proposal for the Decipherment of Aztec Ritual Language”, in Indigenous Graphic Communication Systems. A Theoretical Approach, Katarzyna Mikulska and Jerome A. Offner, eds., pp. 95–122. Louisville: University Press of Colorado. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dehouve, Danièle. 2021. “Combination of Signs in the Codices of Central Mexico: Examples from Sacrifice and Dismemberment Representations”. Published online by Cambridge University Press, First View: 30 July 2021. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Déléage, Pierre. 2010. “Rituels du livre en Amazonie”. Cahiers des Amériques Latines 63-64: 47-62. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Déléage, Pierre. 2013. Inventer l’écriture. Rituels prophétiques et chamaniques des Indiens d'Amérique du Nord: XVIIe-XIXe siècles. Paris: Belles Lettres. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Domenici, Davide. 2017. “Place Names and Political Identities in the Teotihuacán Mural Paintings”, in Constructing Power and Place in Mesoamerica. Pre-hispanic Paintings from Three Regions, Merideth Paxtin and Leticia Staines Cicero, eds., pp. 53-75. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Eco, Umberto. 1996. La estructura ausente. Introducción a la semiótica. Barcelona: Editorial Lumen. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Elkins, James. 1999. The Domain of Images. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Franchetto, Bruna. 2021. “Amerindian conceptions on ‘writing’, as object and practice”. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 5 (2): 85-100. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Friedrich, Margaret H. 1970. “Design Structure and Social Interaction. Archaeological Implications of an Ethnographic Analysis”. American Antiquity 35 (3): 332-343. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Garcés V., Fernando. 2017. Escrituras andinas de ayer y de hoy. Cochabamba: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas y Museo Arqueológico, Universidad Mayor de San Simón. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gelb, Ignace. 1952. A Study of Writing. The Foundations of Grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Goodman, Nelson. 1968. Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. New York: The Bobbs-Merril Company. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Guss, David M. 1989. To Weave and Sing. Art, Symbol, and Narrative in the South American Rain Forest. Berkeley: University of California Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Halbmayer, Ernst. 2004a. “‘Natur’ oder die Inversion des Zeichens Überlegungen zu ‘Oralliteratur’ carib-sprechender Indianer und Natur als Kommunikationsmedium”, in Die Wahrheit reicht weiter als der Mond. Europa-Lateinamerika: Literatur, Migration und Identität, Helmuth A. Niederle and Elke Mader, eds., pp. 213–230. Wien: WUV Univ.-Verl. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Halbmayer, Ernst. 2004b. “Timescapes and the Meaning of Landscape: Examples from the Yukpa of Northwestern Venezuela”, in Kultur, Raum, Landschaft: Zur Bedeutung des Raumes in Zeiten der Globalität, Ernst Halbmayer and Elke Mader, eds., pp. 136–154. Frankfurt am Main: Brandes & Apsel. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Halbmayer, Ernst. 2018a. “Fabricando el mundo. Objetos íntimos y la agentividad de los diseños entre los yukpa”, in Objetos como testigos del contacto cultural: Perspectivas interculturales de la historia y del presente de las poblaciones indígenas del alto río Negro (Brasil/Colombia), Michael Kraus, Ernst Halbmayer and Ingrid Kummels, eds., pp. 319–138. Estudios Indiana 11. Berlin: Ibero-Amerikanisches Institut, Gebr. Mann Verlag. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Halbmayer, Ernst. 2018b. “Los escritos de los objetos: hacia una textualidad material entre los Yukpa”. Mundo Amazónico 9 (1): 245-273. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hardin, Margaret Ann. 1983. “The Structure of Tarascan Pottery Painting”, in Structure and Cognition in Art, Dorothy K. Washburn, ed., pp. 8-24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Harris, Roy. 1995. Signs of Writing. London: Routledge. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hitchcock, Charles B. 1954. “The Sierra de Perijá, Venezuela”. The Geographical Review XLIV (1): 1-28. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Houston, Stephen D. 2000. “Into the Mind of Ancients: Advances in Maya Glyph Studies”. Journal of World Prehistory 14 (2): 121-201. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hugh-Jones, Stephen. 2016. “Writing on Stone; Writing on Paper: Myth, History and Memory in NW Amazonia”. History and Anthropology 27 (2): 154–182. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hyland, Sabine, Gene A. Ware and Madison Clark. 2014. “Knot Direction in a Khipu/Alphabetic Text from the Central Andes”. Latin American Antiquity 25 (2): 189–197. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Jackson, Margaret. 2009. Moche Art and Visual Culture in Ancient Peru. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Jakobson, Roman. 1959. “On Linguistic Aspects of Translation”, in On Translation, Reuben A. Brower, ed., pp. 232–239. Harvard Studies in Comparative Literature 23. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Janusek, John W. 2008. Ancient Tiwanaku. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Jansen, Marteen. 1988. “The Art of Writing in Ancient Mexico: An Ethno-iconological Perspective”. Visible Religion 6: 86-113. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Joralemon, Peter David. 1971. A Study of Olmec Iconography. Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology 7. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Juszczyk, Karolina, Abraham Imbertis Herrera, Daniel Prusaczyk, Stanisław Rzeźnik and Janusz Z. Wołoszyn. 2017. “Toro Muerto. Documenting the Largest Rock Art Site in Peru. Preliminary Report”. Bollettino del Centro Camuno di Studi Preistorici 43: 119-134. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Korpisaari, Antti, Jédu Sagárnaga, Juan Villanueva and Tania Patiño. 2012. “Los depósitos de ofrendas tiwanakotas de la isla Pariti, Lago Titicaca, Bolivia”. Chungará 44 (2): 247-267. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kubler, George. 1967. The Iconography of the Art of Teotihuacan. Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology 4. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Langley, James C. 1993. “Symbols, Signs, and Writing Systems”, in Art from the City of the Gods, Esther Pasztory and Kathleen Berrin, eds., pp. 128-139. New York, San Francisco: Thames and Hudson, Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lhermillier, Alex and Nelly Lhermillier. 1982. “Kano or Mak'â”. Boletín Antropológico 2: 17-22. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lira Barbazo, José. 1998. En la Sierra de Perijá. Introducción al conocimiento zoológico de los aborígenes de la Sierra de Perijá. Maracaibo: Gobernación del Estado Zulia, Universidad del Zulia. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Martin, Simon. 2006. “On Pre-Columbian Narrative: Representation across the Word-Image Divide”, in A Pre-Columbian World, Jeffrey Quilter and Mary Miller, ed., pp. 55-105. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mikulska, Katarzyna. 2008. El lenguaje enmascarado. Un acercamiento a las representaciones gráficas de deidades nahua. Mexico, Warsaw: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, UNAM, IEIeI-University of Warsaw. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mikulska, Katarzyna. 2010. “‘Secret Language’ in Oral and Graphic Form: Religious-Magic Discourse in Aztec Speeches and Manuscripts”. Oral Tradition 25 (2): 325–363. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mikulska, Katarzyna. 2015. Tejiendo destinos. Un acercamiento al sistema de comunicación gráfica en los códices adivinatorios. Mexico, Warsaw: El Colegio Mexiquense, IEIeI-University of Warsaw. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mikulska, Katarzyna. 2020. “Tres Componentes de Codificación en el Sistema de Comunicación Gráfica de Los Códices Vaticano B y Borgia”, in Nuevo Comentario al Códice Vaticano B (Vat. Lat. 3773), Katarzyna Mikulska, ed., pp. 345-397. Mexico, Warsaw: Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, UNAM, ISIiI-University of Warsaw, Vatican Library. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mikulska, Katarzyna and Jerome A. Offner. 2019. Indigenous Graphic Communication System: A Theoretical Approach. Louisville: University Press of Colorado. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Nicholson, Henry B. 1973. “The Late Pre-Hispanic Central Mexican (Aztec) Iconographic System”, in The Iconography of Middle American Sculpture. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Panofsky, Erwin. 1975 (1955). Sinn und Deutung in der bildenden Kunst (Meaning in the visual arts). Cologne: M. Dumont Schauberg. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Peirce, Charles. 1931. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Science and Philosophy and Reviews, Correspondence, and Bibliography. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Posnansky, Arthur. 1957. Tihuanacu. The Craddle of American Man. Tihuanacu. Cuna del Hombre Americano. Vols. III-IV. New York: J.J. Augustin Publisher. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Reichel-Dolmatoff, Gerardo. 1945. “Los indios motilones (etnografía y lingüística)”. Revista del Instituto Etnológico Nacional 2: 15–115. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rivière, Peter. 1971. “The Political Structure of the Trio Indians as Manifested in a System of Ceremonial Dialogue”, in The Translation of Culture, Thomas O. Beidelman, ed., pp. 293-331. London: Tavistock Publications. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Robicsek, Francis. 1981. The Maya Book of the Dead. The Ceramic Codex, University of Virginia Art Museum. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rojas Martínez, Araceli. 2016a. “Casting Maize Seeds in an Ayöök Community: An Approach to the Study of Divination in Mesoamerica” Ancient Mesoamerica 27 (2): 461–478. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rojas Martínez, Araceli. 2016b. “Reading Maize: A Narrative and Psychological Approach to the Study of Divination in Mesoamerica”. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 43: 224–246. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rojas Martínez, Araceli. In preparation. “Pluriversal literacies: an Essay on Mesoamerican Ways of Writing, Painting and Reading”. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rojas Silva, David Vicente. 2008. Los tokapu: graficación de la emblemática inka. La Paz: Producciones Cima Editores. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Salomon, Frank. 2001. “How an Andean ‘Writing Without Words’ Works”. Current Anthropology 42 (1): 1-27. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Salomon, Frank. 2004. The Cord Keepers. Khipus and Cultural Life in a Peruvian Village. Durham, London: Duke University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Salomon, Frank and Sabine Hyland. 2010. “Graphic Pluralism. Native American Systems of Inscription and the Colonial Situation”. Ethnohistory 57 (1): 1-9. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Santos-Granero, Fernando. 1998. “Writing History into the Landscape: Space, Myth, and Ritual in Contemporary Amazonia”. American Ethnologist 25 (2): 128-148. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Schön Y., Miguel and Pedro Jam L. 1953. “Cultura Social”, in La Región de Perijá y sus habitantes, Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales La Salle, ed., pp. 71-98. Maracaibo: Universidad del Zulia. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Severi, Carlo. 1997. “Kuna Picture-Writing: A Study in Iconography and Memory”, in The Art of Being Kuna. Layers of Meaning among the Kuna of Panama, Mari Lyn Salvador, ed., pp. 245-270. Los Angeles: Fowler Museum of Cultural History, University of California. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Severi, Carlo. 2014. “Transmutating Beings: A Proposal for an Anthropology of Thought”. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (2): 41-71. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Severi, Carlo. 2015. The Chimera principle: An Anthropology of Memory and Imagination. Chicago: Hau Books. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Severi, Carlo and Els Lagrou, eds. 2018. Quimeras Em Diálogo: Grafismo E Figuração Nas Artes Indígenas. Rio de Janeiro: 7 Letras. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Stone, Andrea and Marc Zender. 2011. Reading Maya Art: A Hieroglyphic Guide to Ancient Maya Painting and Sculpture. London: Thames and Hudson. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Taube, Karl A. 1992. “The Iconography of Mirrors at Early Classic Teotihuacan”, in Art, Ideology and the City of Teotihuacan, Janet Catherine Berlo, ed., pp. 169–204. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Urban, Greg. 1986. “Ceremonial Dialogues in South America”. American Anthropologist 88 (2): 371-386. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Vareschi, Volkmar. 1959. Geschichtslose Ufer, Auf den Spuren Humboldts am Orinoko (Orinoco arriba: a través de Venezuela siguiendo a Humboldt). München: F. Bruckmann, KG. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Vareschi, Volkmar. 1974. Signos. Semántica del dibujo primitivo. Caracas: Gráficas Armitano. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Vauzelle, Loïc. 2017. “Los dioses mexicas y los elementos naturales en sus atuendos: unos materiales polisémicos”. Trace (En línea) 71. http://journals.openedition.org/trace/2420. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Vauzelle, Loïc. 2018. Tlaloc et Huitzilopochtli: Éléments naturels et attributs dans les parures de deux divinités aztèques aux XVe et XVIe siècles. Ph.D. dissertation, PSL Research University, Université de recherche Paris Sciences Lettres, École Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Paris. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Vidal, Lux Boelitz, Anne-Marie Pessis and Niéde Guidon. 2000. Grafismo indígena: Estudos de antropologia estética. São Paulo: Studio Nobel. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Whittaker, Gordon. 2009. “The principles of Nahuatl Writing”. Göttinger Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, 16: 47–81. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wilbert, Johannes. 1960. “Zur Kenntnis der Parirí”. Archiv für Völkerkunde 15: 80-153. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Zlatev, Jordan. 2012. “Cognitive Semiotics: An Emerging Field for the Transdisciplinary Study of Meaning”. The Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 2–24. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Zorn, Elaine. 2004. Weaving a Future. Tourism, Cloth and Culture on an Andean Island. Iowa: University of Iowa Press. | - |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Española de Antropología Americana | es-ES |
| dc.source | Revista Española de Antropología Americana; Vol. 52 No. 2 (2022); 225-243 | en-US |
| dc.source | Revista Española de Antropología Americana; Vol. 52 Núm. 2 (2022); 225-243 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 1988-2718 | - |
| dc.source | 0556-6533 | - |
| dc.subject | graphic communication systems | en-US |
| dc.subject | the indigenous Americas | en-US |
| dc.subject | semiological theory and methodology | en-US |
| dc.subject | decolonizing epistemologies | en-US |
| dc.subject | sistemas de comunicación gráfica | es-ES |
| dc.subject | las Américas indígenas | es-ES |
| dc.subject | teoría y metodología semiológica | es-ES |
| dc.subject | epistemologías descolonizadoras | es-ES |
| dc.title | From Graphic Units to Unrecognized Landscapes of Expression: New Approaches on Amerindian Graphic Communication Systems | en-US |
| dc.title | From Graphic Units to Unrecognized Landscapes of Expression: New Approaches on Amerindian Graphic Communication Systems | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| dc.type | Artículo revisado por pares | es-ES |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.