Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181072Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Fressoli, Juan Mariano | - |
| dc.creator | Arza, Valeria | - |
| dc.date | 2018-08-27 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:34:13Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:34:13Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/60616 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/TEKN.60616 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181072 | - |
| dc.description | Over the last few years, open science has captured the interest of scientists, policy makers and international development agencies, in large part because of the benefits promised by the new practices. Nevertheless, as the ideas of open science are transformed into concrete initiatives, those initiatives begin to encounter challenges that can delay and/or impede their implementation. Amongst them we find: the absence of knowledge and/or the skills to perform new practices, normative or institutional barriers that block the progress of opening up knowledge production, and the lack of infrastructure which can discourage adoption of new practices. This work systematizes the challenges that open science practices face so as to inform the future development of science and technology policies that can facilitate the advance of those practices in the region. | en-US |
| dc.description | En los últimos años, la ciencia abierta ha capturado gran interés por parte de científicos, hacedores de políticas y agencias de desarrollo internacional, en gran parte debido a los beneficios prometidos por las nuevas prácticas. Sin embargo, a medida que las ideas de ciencia abierta se transforman en iniciativas concretas, comienzan a enfrentar desafíos que pueden retrasar y/o impedir su implementación. Entre ellos se incluyen: la ausencia de conocimiento y/o capacidades para realizar nuevas prácticas, barreras normativas o institucionales que impiden avanzar en la apertura, y falta de infraestructura que puede desalentar su adopción. Este trabajo sistematiza los desafíos que surgen en las prácticas de ciencia abierta con el fin de informar el desarrollo de futuras políticas de ciencia y tecnología que faciliten su avance en la región. | es-ES |
| dc.description | Nos últimos anos, a ciência aberta despertou grande interesse por parte de cientistas, decisores políticos e agências de desenvolvimento internacional, em grande parte devido aos benefícios prometidos pelas novas práticas. No entanto, à medida que ideias de ciência aberta são transformadas em iniciativas concretas, elas começam a enfrentar desafios que podem atrasar e/ou impedir sua implementação. E esses desafios incluem: falta de conhecimento e/ou habilidades para realizar novas práticas; barreiras normativas ou institucionais que impedem progredir na abertura; e falta de infraestrutura – o que desencoraja sua adoção. Este trabalho sistematiza os desafios que surgem nas práticas de ciência aberta, a fim de informar o desenvolvimento de futuras políticas de ciência e tecnologia que venham a facilitar seu avanço na região. | pt-BR |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | spa | - |
| dc.publisher | Grupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguas | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/60616/4564456548865 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Arza, V., Fressoli, M., y López, E. (2017). Ciencia abierta en Argentina: un mapa de experiencias actuales. Ciencia, Docencia y Tecnología, 18 (55), 78-114. Disponible en http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/145/14553608004.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Arza, V., Fressoli, M. y Sebastian, S. (2017). Towards open science in Argentina: From experiences to public policies. First Monday, 22(7), 1-12. Disponible en http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/7876/6330 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Arza, V. y Fressoli, M. (2017). Systematizing benefits of open science practices. Information Services and Use, 37(4), 463-474. Disponible en: https://content.iospress.com/articles/information-services-and-use/isu861 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Amezcua, M., y Pozuelo Zurera, S. (2016). La Revisión por pares abierta, entre desafíos e incertidumbres. Index de Enfermería, 25(4), 293-296. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962016000300017 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature News, 533(7604), 452-454. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bartling, S. y Friesike, S. (2014). Towards Another Scientific Revolution. En Opening Science (pp. 3-15). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_1 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Björk, B.C. (2013). Open Access Are the Barriers to Change Receding? Publications, 1(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications1010005 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Boulton, G., Campbell, P., Collins, B., Elias, P., Hall, W., Graeme, L., O’Neill, O., Rawlins, M., Thornton, J y Vallance, P., Walport, M. (2012). Science as an open enterprise. The Royal Society. Disponible en: https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-saoe.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V y Steinman, L. (2013). Science communication to the general public: why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education, 12(1), E6-E10. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3852879&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Costas, R., Zahedi, Z. y Wouters, P. (2015). Do «altmetrics» correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2003-2019. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/David, P. A. (2004). Towards a Cyberinfrastructure for Enhanced Scientific Collaboration: Providing its «Soft» Foundations May Be the Hardest Part. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1325264 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/European Commission. (2016). EU Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2777/061652 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Felt, U., Barben, D., Irwin, A., Joly, P. B., Rip, A., Stirling, A. y Stöckelová, T. (2013). Science in Society: caring for our futures in turbulent times. Policy briefing, 50. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Finkle, T. A. y Masters, E. (2014). Do MOOCs pose a threat to higher education? Research in Higher Education Journal, 26, 1-11. Disponible en: http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/141968.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Franzoni, C. y Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research policy, 43(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Fressoli, M., y Arza, V. (2017). Negociando la apertura en ciencia abierta: Un análisis de casos ejemplares en Argentina. Revista iberoamericana de ciencia tecnología y sociedad, 12(36), 139-162. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D. e Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 1-12. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Grand, A., Wilkinson, C., Bultitude, K. y Winfield, A. F. T. (2012). Open Science: a new «trust technology»? Science Communication, 34(5), 679-689. http://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012443021 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hamilton, M., Kernohan, D. y Jacobs, N. (2017, junio). Open by default? How can we make the most of open practices in research, education and skills? Disponible en: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/reports/open-by-default | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hess, D. (2007). Alternative pathways in science and industry: Activism, innovation, and the environment in an era of globalization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Leshner, A. I. (2003). Public Engagement with Science. Science, 299(5609), 977. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.299.5609.977 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Masum, H. y Harris, R. (2011). Open source for neglected diseases: Magic bullet or mirage. Results for Development Institute. Disponible en: https://www.r4d.org/wp-content/uploads/Open-source-high-res.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/McAllister, J. W. (2012). Climate Science Controversies and the Demand for Access to Empirical Data. Philosophy of Science, 79(5), 871-880. https://doi.org/10.1086/667871 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/McKiernan, E. C. (2017). Imagining the “open” university: Sharing scholarship to improve research and education. PLoS biology, 15(10), e1002614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002614 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/McKiernan, E. C., Bourne, P. E., Brown, C. T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J. y Yarkoni, T. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife 5. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization. Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00031-1 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/National Information Standards Organization (2004). Understanding metadata. Baltimore: NISO Press. Disponible en: https://www.niso.org/publications/understanding-metadata | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Nielsen, M. (2012). Reinventing Discover: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton, EE.UU.: Princeton University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C. y Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600-2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/OECD (2015). Making Open Science a Reality. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, 25. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1-en | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Open Policy Network (2016). Global Open Policy Report. Disponible en https://creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/StateofOpenPolicyFullReport_FINAL-1-1-1-1.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Packer, A., Perez Sales, D., Santos, S., Mendoza, A., y Meneghini, R. (2018, enero). Los criterios de Indexación de SciELO se alinean con la comunicación en la ciencia abierta [en línea]. Disponible en: https://blog.scielo.org/es/2018/01/10/los-criterios-de-indexacion-de-scielo-se-alinean-con-la-comunicacion-en-la-ciencia-abierta/#.W33CBuhKjcc | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Packer, A., Santos, S., y Meneghini, R. (2017, febrero). SciELO Preprints en camino. Blog SciElo. Disponible en: https://blog.scielo.org/es/2017/02/22/scielo-preprints-en-camino/#.WxsBKO4vzIU | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Perakakis, P. (2015). OPRM: An Open Peer Review Module for integration with OA repositories [Version 1]. The Self Journal of Science. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J. y Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A. y Asgari-Targhi, M. (2010). Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1926), 4039-4056. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0155 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/RIN/NESTA (2010) Open to All: Case Studies of Openness in Research, Joint RIN/NESTA Report, Londres: Research Information Network/National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts. http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/NESTA-RIN_Open_Science_V01_0.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rohs, M. y Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(6), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ross-Hellauer, T., Deppe, A. y Schmidt, B. (2017, mayo). OpenAire survey on open peer review: attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers [en línea]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.570864 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rossel, C. (2015, enero). The World Bank Open Access policy [en línea]. Disponible en: https://otwartanauka.pl/analysis/nauka-otwartosc-swiat/polityka-otwartosci-banku-swiatowego/the-world-bank-open-access-policy | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sanderson, K. (2008). Data on display. Nature, 455. https://doi.org/10.1038/455273a | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Schwarzkopf, S. (2016, abril). It’s not the end of the world if your research gets ‘scooped’. Times Higher Education, Blogs. Disponible en: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/its-not-end-world-if-your-research-gets-scooped#survey-answer | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Shah, D. (2017, noviembre). 200 universities just launched 600 free online courses. Here’s the full list. Disponible en: https://qz.com/1120344/200-universities-just-launched-600-free-online-courses-heres-the-full-list/ | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Scheliga, K. y Friesike, S. (2014). Putting open science into practice: A social dilemma? First Monday, 19(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i9.5381 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 643-681. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Tennant, J. P., Dugan, J. M., Graziotin, M., Jacques, D. C., Waldner, F., Mietchen, D., Elkhatib, Y., Collister, L. B., Pikas, C. K., Crick, T., Masuzzo, P., Caravaggi, A., Berg, D. R., Niemeyer, K. E., Ross-Hellauer, T., Mannheimer, S., Rigling, L., Katz, D. S., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Pacheco-Mendoza, J., Fatima, N., Poblet, M., Isaakidis, M., Irawan, D. E., Renaut, S., Madan, C. R., Matthias, L., Nørgaard Kjær, J., O’Donnell, D. P., Neylon, C., Kearns, S., Selvaraju, M. y Colomb, J. (2017). An interdisciplinary perspective on innovations in peer review. F1000Research, 6, 1151. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.1 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Toelch, U. y Ostwald, D. (2018, marzo). Digital Open Science – Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research. http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FBVEP | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Van Rooyen, S., Godlee, F., Evans, S., Black, N. y Smith, R. (1999). Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers’ recommendations: a randomised trial. Bmj, 318(7175), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Weinberger, D. (2011). Too big to know. Rethinking knowledge now that the facts aren’t the facts, experts are everywhere, and the smartest person in the room is the room. New York: Basic Books. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wiggins, A. y Crowston, K. (2011, January). From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii international conference on(pp. 1-10). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207 | - |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018): Communication, gender violence and resistance practices: new narratives for social change; 429-448 | en-US |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2018): Comunicación, violencia de género y prácticas de resistencia: narrativas innovadoras para un cambio social; 429-448 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 15 n. 2 (2018): Comunicação, violência de gênero e práticas de resistência: narrativas inovadores para uma mudança social; 429-448 | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 1549-2230 | - |
| dc.subject | collaboration | en-US |
| dc.subject | open access | en-US |
| dc.subject | open source | en-US |
| dc.subject | science policy. | en-US |
| dc.subject | acceso abierto | es-ES |
| dc.subject | código abierto | es-ES |
| dc.subject | colaboración | es-ES |
| dc.subject | políticas científicas. | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Unión Europea | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Política de investigación | es-ES |
| dc.subject | acesso aberto | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | colaboração | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | código aberto | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | políticas científicas. | pt-BR |
| dc.title | The challenges of open science policies | en-US |
| dc.title | Los desafíos que enfrentan las prácticas de ciencia abierta | es-ES |
| dc.title | Os desafios enfrentados pelas práticas de ciência aberta | pt-BR |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.