Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/168530Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Guil Bozal, Ana | - |
| dc.date | 2016-11-09 | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_educacion_latinamerican/article/view/5532 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.19053/01227238.5532 | - |
| dc.description | The purpose of this paper is to provide an introduction on the main contributions of feminism to the construction of scientific knowledge. It is evident that not methods, but strong epistemological are necessary to deconstruct positivist approaches, in order to co-construct a science that exceeds false androcentric objectivism in favor of contextualized, inclusive and intersubjectively consensual knowledge serving as an engine for change and transformation of patriarchal power relations. The arrival of women tothe University led to a scientific revolution by incorporating their new point of view, able to detect misogynistic bias that kept them out the history by labeling them as inferior. From there, it has emerged areal rebellion in academic epistemologies –feminist perspectives, postmodern feminists, and the empirical-contextual ones– not specifically for the use of certain methods, but because of the strength of their shared democratic and egalitarian values. | en-US |
| dc.description | El propósito de este trabajo es realizar una introducción sobre las principales aportaciones del feminismo a la construcción científica del conocimiento, observando cómo son necesarios no tanto métodos, como fuertes posicionamientos epistemológicos capaces de de-construir planteamientos positivistas, para co-construir una ciencia que supere los falsos objetivismos androcéntricos en aras de conocimientos contextualizados, inclusivos y consensuados intersubjetivamente, que sirvan de motor de cambio y transformación de las relaciones patriarcales de poder. La llegada de las mujeres a la Universidad supuso una revolución científica al incorporar su nuevo punto de vista, capaz de detectar los sesgos misóginos que las mantuvieron al margen de la historia categorizándolas como inferiores. A partir de ahí se ha producido una verdadera rebelión en las epistemologías académicas -las feministas del punto de vista, los feminismos negros, las feministas postmodernas y las empíricas contextuales- no tanto por el uso de determinadas metodologías, como por la fuerza de sus valores democráticos e igualitarios compartidos. | es-ES |
| dc.description | O objetivo deste trabalho é fornecer uma introdução aos principais contribuições do feminismo para a construção do conhecimento científico, assistindo como são necessários tanto métodos, como fortes posições epistemológicas, capazes de desconstruir abordagens positivistas para co-construir uma ciência que excede uma androcêntrico causa objectivisms dos falsa de conhecimentos intersubjetivamente contextualizada, inclusiva e consensual, para servir como motor de mudança e transformação das relações de poder patriarcal. A chegada das mulheres para a Universidade levou a uma revolução científica, incorporando o seu novo ponto de vista, capaz de detectar viés misógino que permaneceu fora da história categorização como inferiores. A partir daí foi uma verdadeira rebelião na epistemologia feminista acadêmica –a ponto de vista, o feminismo negro, feministas pós-modernas e empírica contextuales– não tanto para o uso de certos métodos, tais como a força dos seus valores compartilhado democrática e igualitária. | pt-BR |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format | text/html | - |
| dc.language | spa | - |
| dc.publisher | Sociedad de Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana y la Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia | en-US |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_educacion_latinamerican/article/view/5532/10525 | - |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_educacion_latinamerican/article/view/5532/5793 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Arenal, Concepción. La mujer del porvenir. Alicante: Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes, 2003. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bertomeu, Mª Angustias et al. Mujeres a Ciencia cierta. Material audiovisual CD-ROM interactivo. Sevilla: Instituto Andaluz de la Mujer. 2005. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bosch, Esperanza, Ferrer, Victoria A. y Gili, Margarita. Historia de la Misoginia. Unversitat de les Illes Balears: Anthropos, 1999. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Collins, Patricia Hill. The Social Construction of Black Feminist Thought. Signs vol. 14, No. 4, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1086/494543 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Collins, Patricia Hill. Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought, Social Problems, vol. 33, No. 6, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1986.33.6.03a00020 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Collins, Patricia Hill. Comment on Hekman’s “Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited”: Where’s the Power?, vol. 22, No. 2, (1997), 375-81. https://doi.org/10.1086/495159 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Chodorow, Nancy. The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520924086 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dinnerstein, Dorothy. The mermaid and the minotaur: Sexual arrangements and human malaise. New York: Harper and Row, 1976. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Fox Keller, Evelyn. Reflexiones sobre Género y Ciencia. Valencia: Alfons el Magnànim, 1991. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Fox Keller, Evelyn. Feminism and Science.Signs7, No. 3, 1982. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Flores Espínola, Artemisa. Metodología feminista: ¿una transformación de prácticas científicas? Tesis Doctoral. Madrid: Universidad Complutense, 2013. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice (traduccción: La moral y la teoría: Psicología del desarrollo femenino). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1985. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/González García, Marta I. Género y Conocimiento. En López Cerezo, José Antonio y Sánchez Ron, José M. eds. Ciencia, tecnología, sociedad y cultura en el cambio de siglo. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, OEI, 2001. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Guil, Ana. El papel de los arquetipos en los actuales estereotipos sobre las mujeres. Comunicar Revista de Comunicación y Educación. No. 12: “Estereotipos en los medios, educar para el sentido crítico.1999. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Guil, Ana. De la mitología al ciberfeminismo: tejedoras de redes. En: Ricardo Pérez-Amat, Sonia Núñez y Antonio García Jiménez. Eds. Comunicación, identidad y género. Madrid: Fragua. Vol. I, 2008. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Guil, Ana. The Voice of Women Psychologist. En Ana Guil, Ana L. Comunian y Ann O.Roark, ed. Celebrating 70 years of working towards Health, Peace and Social Justice. Sevilla: Arcibeleditores 2015. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Harding, Sandra. Ciencia y feminismo. Madrid: Ediciones Morata, 1996. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Harding, Sandra, The instability of the Analytical Categories of Feminist Theory.1986. https://doi.org/10.1086/494270 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Harding, Sandra. A Socially Relevant Philosophy of Science? Resources from Standpoint Theory’s Controversiality, 19, No.1.Hypatia:2004. https://doi.org/10.1353/hyp.2004.0008 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Harding, Sandra. Whose Science, Who Knowledge?: Thinking from Women’s Live. 1991. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hartsock, Nancy C.M. The feminist standpoint: developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. En Harding, Sandra y Hintikka, Merrill, ed. Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Holanda: Reidel Publishing Company. 1983. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hartsock, Nancy C M. Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism. Northeastern: University Press, 1986. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hartsock, Nancy C M. Comment on Hekman's "Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory. Revisited": Truth or Justice? Signs. Vol. 22, No. 2.1997. https://doi.org/10.1086/495161 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hekman, Susan. Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1086/495159 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hilary Rose, Brain Hand and Heart. A Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences, Signs, vol. 9, no.1.1983. https://doi.org/10.1086/494025 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Jane, Flax, Thinking fragments: Psychoanalysis, feminism and post-modernism in the contemporary west. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520329409 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Longino, Helen E. Subjects, power, and knowledge: description and prescription philosophies of sciences. En Alcoff, Linda y Potter, Elizabeth. ed. Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge. 1993. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Longino, Helen E. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691209753 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Longino, Helen E. Gender, Politics and Theorical Virtues. SyntheseVol. 104, No. 3. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064506 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Longino, Helen E. How Values Can Be Good for Science. En Peter Machamer (ed). Science, values, and Objectivity. Pittsburgh: University Press, 2004. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pisan de, Christine. La ciudad de las damas. https://seminariolecturasfeministas.files. wordpress.com/2012/01/la-ciudad-de-las-damas-texto.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ruddick, Sara, Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon, 1989. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Smith, Dorothy. Women’s Perspective as a Radical Critique of Sociology», En: Evelyn Fox Keller y Helen Longino: Feminism & Science. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1997. Original en Sociological Inquiry, 1974, Vol. 44, No.1. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Smith, Dorothy. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1990. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Smith, Dorothy. Comment on Hekman's “Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited. Signs, Vol. 22, No. 2.1997. 20de%20la%20medicina.htm https://doi.org/10.1086/495164 | - |
| dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2016 Journal History of Latin American Education | en-US |
| dc.source | Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana; Vol. 18 No. 27 (2016): Argelia Mercedes Laya López; 263-288 | en-US |
| dc.source | Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana; Vol. 18 Núm. 27 (2016): Argelia Mercedes Laya López; 263-288 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 2256-5248 | - |
| dc.source | 0122-7238 | - |
| dc.subject | Gender; feminism; construction of scientific knowledge; women; University; rebellion | en-US |
| dc.subject | Social Sciences | en-US |
| dc.subject | Género; feminismo; construcción científica del conocimiento; mujeres, universidad; rebelión | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Ciencias Sociales | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Gênero; feminismo; construção de conhecimento científico; mulheres, universitários; rebelião | pt-BR |
| dc.title | Gender and construction of scientific knowledge | en-US |
| dc.title | Género y construcción científica del conocimiento | es-ES |
| dc.title | Gênero e construção do conhecimento científico | pt-BR |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| dc.type | Artículo de Revisión | es-ES |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Doctorado en Ciencias de la Educación - DCE - UPTC - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.