1. Repositorio institucional de CLACSO
2. Colección de los Centros Asociados
3. Ecuador
4. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - FCH-PUCE - Cosecha

Título :	Dialogue between courts in relation to vulnerable groups Diálogo entre cortes en relación con los grupos vulnerables Dialogue entre les tribunaux concernant les groupes vulnérables Dialogo tra tribunali in relazione ai gruppi vulnerabili Diálogo entre tribunais em relação a grupos vulneráveis
Palabras clave :	constitutional law;access to justice;right to work;judicial decision;right of vulnerable groups;derecho constitucional;acceso a la justicia;derecho al trabajo;sentencia judicial;derecho de grupos vulnerables
Editorial :	Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - PUCE: Centro de Publicaciones y Dirección de Investigación
Descripción :	In this article we will try to determine the existence of a dialogue between courts of the deliberative type, whose objective is the coordination of actions to achieve a better course of action achieving an effective action and with less negative effects and the relationship of this with the protection of vulnerable groups foreseen in the Ecuadorian constitution, for this analysis is taken as reference the ex-traordinary protection actions resolved by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador in the period 2008-2018, specifically five processes have been considered in which reference and appointment of the criteria of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights issued in rulings or advisory opinions where it was resolved in favor of a gender case or for the benefit of persons belonging to priority attention groups. This will identify, in each case, the precedent or jurisprudential rule that the Ecuadorian constitutional judges dictated in this context and that will constitute jurisprudential precedents for its application in the future. KEYWORDS: constitutional law, access to justice, right to work, judicial decision, right of vulnerable groups JEL CODE: J13, J15 RESUMENEn el presente artículo se buscará determinar la existencia de un diálogo entre cortes del tipo deliberativo, cuyo objetivo es la coordinación de actuaciones para conseguir un mejor curso de acción logrando una actuación eficaz y con menores efectos negativos y la relación de este con la protección de grupos vulnerables previstos en la Constitución ecuatoriana, para este análisis se toma como referencia las acciones extraordinarias de protección resueltas por la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador en el período 2008-2018, específicamente se han considerado cinco procesos en los que se hace referencia y cita de los criterios de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos emitidos en fallos u opiniones consultivas donde se resolvió a favor de un caso de género o en beneficio de personas pertenecientes a grupos de atención prioritaria. Se identificará, de esta manera en cada caso el precedente o regla jurisprudencial que los jueces constitucionales ecuatorianos dictaron bajo este contexto y que constituirán precedentes jurisprudenciales para su aplicación en el futuro. ABSTRACTIn this article we will try to determine the existence of a dialogue between courts of the deliberative type, whose objective is the coordination of actions to achieve a better course of action achieving an effective action and with less negative effects and the relationship of this with the protection of vulnerable groups foreseen in the Ecuadorian constitution, for this analysis is taken as reference the extraordinary protection actions resolved by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador in the period 2008-2018, specifically five processes have been considered in which reference and appointment of the criteria of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights issued in rulings or advisory opinions where it was resolved in favor of a gender case or for the benefit of persons belonging to priority attention groups. This will identify, in each case, the precedent or jurisprudential rule that the Ecuadorian constitutional judges dictated in this context and that will constitute jurisprudential precedents for its application in the future. KEYWORDS: constitutional law, access to justice, right to work, judicial decision, right of vulnerable groups JEL CODE / CLASIFICACIÓN JEL: J13, J15
URI :	http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/155317
Otros identificadores :	http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/101 10.26807/rfj.v0i4.101
Aparece en las colecciones:	Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - FCH-PUCE - Cosecha

Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.