Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/124618
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor10070-
dc.contributor122893-
dc.creatorDelgado Wise, Raúl-
dc.creatorCypher, James-
dc.date2017-04-12T19:48:46Z-
dc.date2017-04-12T19:48:46Z-
dc.date2005-12-02-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-25T17:51:25Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-25T17:51:25Z-
dc.identifierinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11845/41-
dc.identifier.urihttp://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/124618-
dc.descriptionThere have been innumerable attempts to define and characterize the tendency toward accelerating internationalization (consisting of three simultaneous movements in the current era: rapidly expanding international trade, an explosive growth in international financial flows and activities, and one new element—the creation of globally integrated systems of production). This process of accelerating internationalization is sometimes understood to define “globalization”. Yet, globalization remains an elusive concept often capriciously defined and vaguely employed. Among other objectives, we seek to add some specificity to the process of accelerating internationalization through the examination of what could be considered a paradigmatic case: NAFTA, with particular reference to Mexico’s role in the transnational production system that NAFTA has created. We seek to illuminate in one important instance what has occurred as both the US and Mexico have exhibited a process of asymmetrical integration. This case analysis cannot seek to define “globalization”, least of all because it is an ideologically charged term. Nonetheless, the pathological process we explore below cannot be considered an aberration or an exception to the dynamics of internationalization (or “globalization”). Rather, we maintain, it is clearly derivative of, and a definitive negation of, the neoclassical/neoliberal percept that an indiscriminate opening between nations (or “free trade”) will generate significant mutual benefits for these nations (irrespective of their relative power, history, distinct productive apparatuses, relative level of development, etc.).-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPrinceton University-
dc.relationhttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0002716206297527?journalCode=anna-
dc.relationgeneralPublic-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States-
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/-
dc.sourceNafta and Beyons alternative disciplinary perspecives in the study gf global trade and development (Princeton University : December 2-3, 2005)-
dc.subjectCIENCIAS SOCIALES [5]-
dc.subjectinfo:eu-repo/classification/Financial flows-
dc.subjectinfo:eu-repo/classification/Internationalization-
dc.subjectinfo:eu-repo/classification/Globalization-
dc.subjectinfo:eu-repo/classification/Transnational production-
dc.titleThe strategic role of labor in mexico´s subordinated integration into the u.s. production system under NAFTA-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject-
dc.coverageMéxico-
Aparece en las colecciones: Unidad Académica en Estudios del Desarrollo - UAED/UAZ - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.